Suppr超能文献

不同 Gleason 模式对 4 级分组前列腺癌活检的预后影响。

Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9179-9187. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is considered a single entity; however, there are questions regarding prognostic heterogeneity. This study assessed the prognostic differences among various Gleason scores (GSs) classified as GG 4 PC on biopsy before radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, and a total of 1791 patients (GS 3 + 5: 190; GS 4 + 4: 1557; and GS 5 + 3: 44) with biopsy GG 4 were included for analysis. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with high-risk surgical pathologic features. Cox regression models were used to analyze time-dependent oncologic endpoints.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 75 months, 750 patients (41.9%) experienced BCR, 146 (8.2%) died of any causes, and 57 (3.2%) died of PC. Biopsy GS 5 + 3 was associated with significantly higher rates of GS upgrading in RP specimens than GS 3 + 5 and GS 4 + 4. On multivariable analysis adjusted for clinicopathologic features, different GSs within GG 4 were significantly associated with BCR (p = 0.03) but not PC-specific or all-cause mortality. Study limitations include the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GG 4 at biopsy exhibited some limited biological and clinical heterogeneity. Specifically, GS 5 + 3 had an increased risk of GS upgrading. This can help individualize patients' counseling and encourage further study to refine biopsy specimen-based GG classification.

摘要

背景

Gleason 评分 4 级(GG4)前列腺癌被认为是单一实体;然而,关于其预后异质性仍存在疑问。本研究评估了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)前活检中 GG4 前列腺癌不同 Gleason 评分(GS)之间的预后差异。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,共纳入 1791 例活检 GG4 患者(GS3+5:190;GS4+4:1557;GS5+3:44)进行分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验分析生化复发(BCR)无复发生存、癌症特异性生存和总体生存。采用逻辑回归分析识别与高危手术病理特征相关的因素。采用 Cox 回归模型分析时间依赖性肿瘤学终点。

结果

在中位随访 75 个月期间,750 例患者(41.9%)发生 BCR,146 例(8.2%)死于任何原因,57 例(3.2%)死于 PC。与 GS3+5 和 GS4+4 相比,活检 GS5+3 在 RP 标本中 GS 升级的发生率明显更高。多变量分析调整临床病理特征后,GG4 内不同 GS 与 BCR 显著相关(p=0.03),但与 PC 特异性或全因死亡率无关。研究的局限性包括缺乏中心病理标本评估。

结论

活检时 GG4 的患者表现出一定的生物学和临床异质性。具体而言,GS5+3 的 GS 升级风险增加。这有助于对患者进行个体化咨询,并鼓励进一步研究以完善基于活检标本的 GG 分级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfce/8591010/64c0ea2fb42d/10434_2021_10257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验