Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants, Macon, Georgia, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1365-1370. doi: 10.1111/pace.14296. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
Permanent cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are traditionally implanted with the assistance of fluoroscopy. While clinically effective, this technique exposes both patients and providers to radiation which is associated with adverse health effects and represents an occupational hazard. In this study, we investigate the safety and feasibility of permanent CIED placement under the guidance of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). There is also increasing interest in use of non-fluoroscopic options for noninvasive cardiac electrophysiologic procedures.
Fifteen patients consecutively consented for initial implant of CIEDs, specifically dual chamber pacemakers (DCPM) and dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (DCICDs). Patients were excluded if they had previous implants, abandoned leads, or anatomic anomalies including congenital and known persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC). We used TTE to guide and implant atrial and ventricular leads.
Eleven patients received DCPMs and four patients received DCICDs. The procedure duration was 49.3 min for DCICD and 52.3 min for DCPM, p = .807. The average number of right atrial lead attempts was 1.6 for DCPMs and 1.8 for DCICD, p = .860. The average number of right ventricular lead attempts for DCPMs was 2.2 and 1.0 attempt for DCICDs, p = .044. There were no complications at 90-day follow-up.
We demonstrate the feasibility of TTE-guided DCPM/DCICD implantation without use of fluoroscopy. We present this method as a safe alternative for permanent CIED placement that may reduce risk of radiation exposure and cost while maintaining safety and efficacy. No operators wore lead aprons during the procedure.
永久性心脏植入式电子设备 (CIED) 传统上是在透视的辅助下植入的。虽然在临床上有效,但这种技术会使患者和医务人员暴露在辐射下,从而产生不良健康影响,并代表一种职业危害。在这项研究中,我们研究了在经胸超声心动图 (TTE) 引导下进行永久性 CIED 放置的安全性和可行性。对于非侵入性心脏电生理程序,使用非透视选择的兴趣也在增加。
连续有 15 名患者同意进行初始 CIED 植入,具体为双腔起搏器 (DCPM) 和双腔植入式心律转复除颤器 (DCICD)。如果患者有先前的植入物、废弃的导联或解剖异常(包括先天性和已知的永存左上腔静脉 (PLSVC)),则将其排除在外。我们使用 TTE 引导和植入心房和心室导联。
11 名患者接受了 DCPM,4 名患者接受了 DCICD。DCICD 的手术时间为 49.3 分钟,DCPM 的手术时间为 52.3 分钟,p=0.807。DCPM 的右心房导联尝试次数平均为 1.6 次,DCICD 的右心房导联尝试次数平均为 1.8 次,p=0.860。DCPM 的右心室导联尝试次数平均为 2.2 次,而 DCICD 的右心室导联尝试次数为 1.0 次,p=0.044。在 90 天随访时没有并发症。
我们证明了在不使用透视的情况下,TTE 引导 DCPM/DCICD 植入的可行性。我们提出这种方法作为一种安全的替代永久性 CIED 放置方法,可降低辐射暴露的风险和成本,同时保持安全性和有效性。在手术过程中,没有操作人员佩戴铅围裙。