Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jul 16;64(7):2472-2489. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00713. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of a 10-min vocal exertion task on voice and respiratory measures, to determine whether restorative strategies can mitigate these effects after cessation of exertion, and to assess whether these strategies continue to reduce these detrimental effects when vocal exertion is resumed. Method A prospective, repeated-measures design was used. On consecutive days, 20 participants (equal men and women) completed two vocal exertion tasks separated by 10 min of restoration strategies: vocal rest or controlled phonation (low-level tissue mobilization using straw phonation). Voice and respiratory data were collected at baseline, following the first exertion task, after restoration strategies, and after the second exertion task. Outcome measures included (a) vocal effort, (b) phonation threshold pressure, (c) maximum and minimum fundamental frequencies, (d) cepstral peak prominence of connected speech, (e) lung volume initiation and termination, (f) percent vital capacity expended per syllable, and (g) number of syllables per breath group. Results A worsening of phonation threshold pressure ( < .001), vocal effort ( < .001), and increase of minimum fundamental frequency ( = .007) were observed after vocal exertion. Lung volume initiation ( < .001) and lung volume termination ( < .001) increased. These changes were largely reversed by restoration strategies, but only controlled phonation prevented exertion-induced changes in respiratory kinematic measures on a subsequent vocal exertion task. Conclusions Exertion-induced voice changes occur rapidly and may be mitigated by either controlled phonation or vocal rest. Controlled phonation is recommended as a superior strategy due to evidence of a protective effect on a successive vocal exertion task.
本研究旨在探讨 10 分钟发声努力任务对声音和呼吸测量的影响,确定恢复策略在发声停止后是否可以减轻这些影响,以及评估这些策略在恢复发声时是否继续减少这些有害影响。
采用前瞻性、重复测量设计。在连续的两天里,20 名参与者(男女各半)分别完成了两项发声努力任务,中间间隔 10 分钟的恢复策略:发声休息或控制发声(使用吸管发声进行低水平组织动员)。在基线、第一次发声努力任务后、恢复策略后和第二次发声努力任务后收集声音和呼吸数据。主要结局指标包括:(a)发声努力度,(b)声门阈压,(c)最大和最小基频,(d)言语连接音的倒谱峰值突出度,(e)肺容量起始和终止,(f)每个音节消耗的肺活量百分比,以及(g)每个呼吸组的音节数。
发声努力后,声门阈压(<.001)、发声努力度(<.001)和最小基频增加(=.007)恶化。肺容量起始(<.001)和肺容量终止(<.001)增加。这些变化主要通过恢复策略得到逆转,但只有控制发声可以防止呼吸运动测量在随后的发声努力任务中出现与发声相关的变化。
发声努力引起的声音变化发生迅速,控制发声或发声休息均可减轻。由于有证据表明控制发声对连续发声努力任务具有保护作用,因此建议将其作为一种更优的策略。