Suppr超能文献

精英自行车运动员在重复30秒冲刺过程中的有氧和无氧贡献。

The Aerobic and Anaerobic Contribution During Repeated 30-s Sprints in Elite Cyclists.

作者信息

Almquist Nicki Winfield, Sandbakk Øyvind, Rønnestad Bent R, Noordhof Dionne

机构信息

Section for Health and Exercise Physiology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.

Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2021 May 26;12:692622. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.692622. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Although the ability to sprint repeatedly is crucial in road cycling races, the changes in aerobic and anaerobic power when sprinting during prolonged cycling has not been investigated in competitive elite cyclists. Here, we used the gross efficiency (GE)-method to investigate: (1) the absolute and relative aerobic and anaerobic contributions during 3 × 30-s sprints included each hour during a 3-h low-intensity training (LIT)-session by 12 cyclists, and (2) how the energetic contribution during 4 × 30-s sprints is affected by a 14-d high-volume training camp with (SPR, = 9) or without (CON, = 9) inclusion of sprints in LIT-sessions. The aerobic power was calculated based on GE determined before, after sprints, or the average of the two, while the anaerobic power was calculated by subtracting the aerobic power from the total power output. When repeating 30-s sprints, the mean power output decreased with each sprint ( < 0.001, ES:0.6-1.1), with the majority being attributed to a decrease in mean anaerobic power (first vs. second sprint: -36 ± 15 W, < 0.001, ES:0.7, first vs. third sprint: -58 ± 16 W, < 0.001, ES:1.0). Aerobic power only decreased during the third sprint (first vs. third sprint: -17 ± 5 W, < 0.001, ES:0.7, second vs. third sprint: 16 ± 5 W, < 0.001, ES:0.8). Mean power output was largely maintained between sets (first set: 786 ± 30 W vs. second set: 783 ± 30 W, = 0.917, ES:0.1, vs. third set: 771 ± 30 W, = 0.070, ES:0.3). After a 14-d high-volume training camp, mean power output during the 4 × 30-s sprints increased on average 25 ± 14 W in SPR ( < 0.001, ES:0.2), which was 29 ± 20 W more than CON ( = 0.008, ES: 0.3). In SPR, mean anaerobic power and mean aerobic power increased by 15 ± 13 W ( = 0.026, ES:0.2) and by 9 ± 6 W ( = 0.004, ES:0.2), respectively, while both were unaltered in CON. In conclusion, moderate decreases in power within sets of repeated 30-s sprints are primarily due to a decrease in anaerobic power and to a lesser extent in aerobic power. However, the repeated sprint-ability (multiple sets) and corresponding energetic contribution are maintained during prolonged cycling in elite cyclists. Including a small number of sprints in LIT-sessions during a 14-d training camp improves sprint-ability mainly through improved anaerobic power.

摘要

尽管在公路自行车比赛中反复冲刺的能力至关重要,但在竞技精英自行车运动员中,长时间骑行时冲刺过程中有氧和无氧功率的变化尚未得到研究。在此,我们使用总效率(GE)法进行研究:(1)12名自行车运动员在3小时低强度训练(LIT)课程中,每小时进行3次30秒冲刺时的绝对和相对有氧及无氧贡献;(2)在14天的高容量训练营中,LIT课程中包含(SPR,n = 9)或不包含(CON,n = 9)冲刺时,4次30秒冲刺过程中的能量贡献如何受到影响。有氧功率基于冲刺前、冲刺后或两者的平均值确定的GE来计算,而无氧功率通过从总功率输出中减去有氧功率来计算。重复进行30秒冲刺时,每次冲刺的平均功率输出均下降(P < 0.001,效应量:0.6 - 1.1),其中大部分归因于平均无氧功率的下降(第一次与第二次冲刺:-36 ± 15 W,P < 0.001,效应量:0.7;第一次与第三次冲刺:-58 ± 16 W,P < 0.001,效应量:1.0)。有氧功率仅在第三次冲刺时下降(第一次与第三次冲刺:-17 ± 5 W,P < 0.001,效应量:0.7;第二次与第三次冲刺:16 ± 5 W,P < 0.001,效应量:0.8)。各训练组间平均功率输出基本保持不变(第一组:786 ± 30 W vs. 第二组:783 ± 30 W,P = 0.917,效应量:0.1;vs. 第三组:771 ± 30 W,P = 0.070,效应量:0.3)。经过14天的高容量训练营后,SPR组4次30秒冲刺的平均功率输出平均增加25 ± 14 W(P < 0.001,效应量:0.2),比CON组多29 ± 20 W(P = 0.008,效应量:0.3)。在SPR组中,平均无氧功率和平均有氧功率分别增加了15 ± 13 W(P = 0.026,效应量:0.2)和9 ± 6 W(P = 0.004,效应量:0.2),而CON组两者均未改变。总之,在重复的30秒冲刺组内功率适度下降主要是由于无氧功率下降,有氧功率下降程度较小。然而,精英自行车运动员在长时间骑行过程中重复冲刺能力(多组)及相应的能量贡献得以保持。在14天的训练营中,LIT课程中包含少量冲刺主要通过提高无氧功率来改善冲刺能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3f/8187900/e45533baeea3/fphys-12-692622-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验