Suppr超能文献

移民背景下跨越社会界限:德国工会中的异族通婚与性别化就业模式

Crossing Social Boundaries in an Immigration Context: Exogamy and Gendered Employment Patterns in Unions in Germany.

作者信息

Braack Mirko K, Milewski Nadja, Trappe Heike

机构信息

Institute for Sociology and Demography, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Gender Issues. 2022;39(2):142-176. doi: 10.1007/s12147-021-09281-8. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

Abstract

We study gendered employment patterns in unions by focusing on the role of exogamy for non-migrants in Germany. Classical assimilation theory has studied such mixed migrant-non-migrant unions mainly with a focus on the members of ethnic minorities. However, this perspective neglects the question of the social consequences of exogamy for the members of the majority group. We aim to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the association of being in a mixed union and the employment patterns of the couple. Our theoretical considerations and working hypotheses are derived from modernization theories, welfare state and labor market theories, gender studies, and social boundary-crossing frameworks. Drawing on the scientific use file of the German Microcensus of 2013, our sample consists of 44,499 non-migrant men (about 7% of whom are in a mixed union with a migrant) and 43,722 non-migrant women (about 5% of whom are in a mixed union). We estimate multinomial logistic regression models. We conclude that the persistent disadvantage for immigrants on the labor market in Germany shapes the gendered employment patterns of their unions, which, in turn, affect the members of the majority population. For non-migrant men, exogamy is associated with a re-traditionalization of employment patterns, whereby a man is more likely to be the main earner if he is in an exogamous union than if he is in an endogamous union. For non-migrant women, by contrast, we find evidence of a role reversal in exogamous unions, whereby the woman is more likely to be the main earner.

摘要

我们通过关注异族通婚对德国非移民的作用来研究工会中的性别化就业模式。经典同化理论在研究这种移民与非移民混合的工会时,主要关注的是少数族裔成员。然而,这种观点忽视了异族通婚对多数群体成员的社会影响问题。我们旨在通过调查异族通婚与夫妻就业模式之间的关联来填补这一知识空白。我们的理论思考和工作假设源自现代化理论、福利国家和劳动力市场理论、性别研究以及社会跨界框架。利用2013年德国微观人口普查的科学使用档案,我们的样本包括44499名非移民男性(其中约7%与移民有异族通婚关系)和43722名非移民女性(其中约5%与移民有异族通婚关系)。我们估计多项逻辑回归模型。我们得出结论,德国劳动力市场上移民持续面临的劣势塑造了他们工会中的性别化就业模式,而这种模式反过来又影响了多数人口的成员。对于非移民男性来说,异族通婚与就业模式的重新传统化有关,即处于异族通婚关系中的男性比处于同族通婚关系中的男性更有可能成为主要挣钱者。相比之下,对于非移民女性,我们发现在异族通婚关系中有角色逆转的证据,即女性更有可能成为主要挣钱者。

相似文献

1
Crossing Social Boundaries in an Immigration Context: Exogamy and Gendered Employment Patterns in Unions in Germany.
Gender Issues. 2022;39(2):142-176. doi: 10.1007/s12147-021-09281-8. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Migration, Partner Selection, and Fertility in Germany: How Many Children are Born in Mixed Unions?
Eur J Popul. 2024 Jun 28;40(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s10680-024-09710-w.
3
Partnership transitions among the children of immigrants in Norway: The role of partner choice.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2021 Mar;75(1):133-152. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1851749. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Partner Choice and the Transition to Parenthood for Second-Generation Women of Turkish and Moroccan Origin in Belgium.
Eur J Popul. 2017 Aug 29;34(4):579-608. doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9438-0. eCollection 2018 Oct.
5
At risk of reproductive disadvantage? Exploring fertility awareness among migrant women in Germany.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2021 Dec 31;14:226-238. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.007. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Immigration and migration in America: social impact and social response.
Int Migr. 1988 Dec;26(4):441-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1988.tb00663.x.
8
Structural shifts in the employment of foreign workers in Austria.
Int Migr. 1985 Mar;23(1):45-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1985.tb00566.x.
10
Gender and migration on the labour market: Additive or interacting disadvantages in Germany?
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Sep;42(5):1325-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Migration, Partner Selection, and Fertility in Germany: How Many Children are Born in Mixed Unions?
Eur J Popul. 2024 Jun 28;40(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s10680-024-09710-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Against 'immigrant integration': for an end to neocolonial knowledge production.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Who Is Doing the Housework in Multicultural Britain?
Sociology. 2018 Feb;52(1):55-74. doi: 10.1177/0038038516674674. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Gender and migration on the labour market: Additive or interacting disadvantages in Germany?
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Sep;42(5):1325-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 May 30.
4
Partner Choice Patterns Among the Descendants of Turkish Immigrants in Europe.
Eur J Popul. 2012 Aug;28(3):241-268. doi: 10.1007/s10680-012-9265-2. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
5
Education and black-white interracial marriage.
Demography. 2006 Nov;43(4):673-89. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0033.
6
Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends.
Annu Rev Sociol. 1998(24):395-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395.
7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验