Suppr超能文献

盆腔器官脱垂患者行腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术加次全子宫切除术的比较

Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

作者信息

Campagna Giuseppe, Vacca Lorenzo, Panico Giovanni, Rumolo Valerio, Caramazza Daniela, Lombisani Andrea, Rossitto Cristiano, Gadonneix Pierre, Scambia Giovanni, Ercoli Alfredo

机构信息

UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Fondation St Jean de Dieu, Paris, France.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):359-368. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04865-0. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The choice of whether or not to preserve the uterus in the case of patients with urogenital prolapse who undergo sacral colpopexy is still debated. We compared objective and subjective outcomes of laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy (LSHP) and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy (LSCP/SCH) in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted at the Urogynecology Department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS of Rome and at the Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital of Paris. We collected data of 136 patients; 78 underwent LSHP and 58 underwent LSCP/SCH for pelvic organ prolapse between January 2016 and December 2017.

RESULTS

Patients of the two groups had similar preoperative characteristics. All patients completed 24-month follow-up evaluation. Overall, anatomical cure rate was 84.6% and 87.9% in the LSHP group and LSCP/SCH group, respectively, without statistically significant differences. In particular, in the LSHP group the anatomical success rate was 94.9%, 92.3% and 92.3% for the apical, anterior and posterior vaginal compartment whereas in the LSHP group LSCP/SCH was 100%, 91.4% and 94.8%, respectively. Subjective success rate was 89.7% among patients who underwent LSHP and 93.1% among women who underwent LSCP/SCH (p = 0.494). The median operative time (OT) was significantly shorter in LSHP. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy and intra- and postoperative complications. Patients' satisfaction was high in both groups without statistical differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic procedures are safe and effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. LSHP can be offered as an alternative in women who are strongly motivated to preserve the uterus in the absence of abnormal uterine findings.

摘要

引言与假设

对于接受骶骨阴道固定术的泌尿生殖系统脱垂患者,是否保留子宫仍存在争议。我们比较了有症状盆腔器官脱垂患者行腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术(LSHP)和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术联合次全子宫切除术(LSCP/SCH)的客观和主观结果。

方法

这是一项在罗马的圣心天主教大学综合医院基金会妇产科和巴黎的圣十字西蒙医院进行的多中心回顾性队列研究。我们收集了136例患者的数据;2016年1月至2017年12月期间,78例患者接受了LSHP,58例患者因盆腔器官脱垂接受了LSCP/SCH。

结果

两组患者术前特征相似。所有患者均完成了24个月的随访评估。总体而言,LSHP组和LSCP/SCH组的解剖治愈率分别为84.6%和87.9%,无统计学显著差异。具体而言,LSHP组中阴道顶端、前壁和后壁的解剖成功率分别为94.9%、92.3%和92.3%,而LSCP/SCH组中分别为100%、91.4%和94.8%。接受LSHP的患者主观成功率为89.7%,接受LSCP/SCH的女性主观成功率为93.1%(p = 0.494)。LSHP组的中位手术时间明显更短。两组在估计失血量、中转开腹以及术中及术后并发症方面无显著差异。两组患者的满意度均较高,无统计学差异。

结论

两种腹腔镜手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂均安全有效。对于强烈希望在子宫无异常发现的情况下保留子宫的女性,LSHP可作为一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验