Suppr超能文献

记忆支持治疗提供者检查表的制定与验证。

The Development and Validation of the Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist.

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley.

University of California, Berkeley; RAND Corporation.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2021 Jul;52(4):932-944. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

Abstract

Patient memory for the contents of treatment is staggeringly poor, and poor memory for treatment is associated with worse treatment outcome. Accordingly, the Memory Support Intervention was developed to improve patient memory for treatment as an adjunct to treatment as usual. As plans to disseminate the Memory Support Intervention are developed, it is important to have efficient, accurate methods of measuring fidelity to the intervention. However, the existing method of assessing fidelity to the Memory Support Intervention, the Memory Support Rating Scale (MSRS), is burdensome and requires trained independent-raters to spend multiple hours reviewing session recordings, which is not feasible in many routine mental health care settings. Hence, a provider-rated measure of fidelity to the MSI has been developed. The goal of this study is to examine the reliability and validity of scores on this measure-the Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist. A sample of Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklists (N = 319) were completed by providers (N = 8) treating adults with depression (N = 84). Three metrics of the Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist were evaluated: (a) the internal consistency and structural validity using confirmatory factor analysis based on prior research on the MSRS and the Memory Support Intervention, (b) construct validity, and (c) predictive validity. Results indicate that the Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist yields reliable and valid scores of fidelity to the Memory Support Intervention. Overall, this checklist offers a viable, brief method of evaluating fidelity to the Memory Support Intervention.

摘要

患者对治疗内容的记忆惊人地差,而对治疗的记忆差与治疗效果差有关。因此,开发了记忆支持干预措施,以改善患者对治疗的记忆,作为治疗的辅助手段。随着传播记忆支持干预措施的计划的制定,拥有高效、准确的方法来衡量干预措施的保真度非常重要。然而,评估记忆支持干预措施保真度的现有方法,即记忆支持评定量表(MSRS),繁琐且需要经过培训的独立评估者花费多个小时来审查会议记录,这在许多常规心理健康护理环境中是不可行的。因此,已经开发了一种针对 MSI 的提供者评定保真度的措施。本研究的目的是检验该措施——记忆支持治疗提供者清单的信度和效度。由 8 名治疗抑郁症患者的提供者(N = 84)完成了 319 份记忆支持治疗提供者清单(N = 319)。评估了记忆支持治疗提供者清单的三个指标:(a)基于 MSRS 和记忆支持干预的先前研究的验证性因素分析,评估内部一致性和结构有效性,(b)构念有效性,和(c)预测有效性。结果表明,记忆支持治疗提供者清单提供了可靠和有效的记忆支持干预措施保真度评分。总体而言,该清单提供了一种可行的、简短的评估记忆支持干预措施保真度的方法。

相似文献

1
The Development and Validation of the Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist.
Behav Ther. 2021 Jul;52(4):932-944. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
The development and validation of the Memory Support Rating Scale.
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):715-25. doi: 10.1037/pas0000219. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Measuring implementation fidelity in a community-based parenting intervention.
Nurs Res. 2010 May-Jun;59(3):158-65. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181dbb2e2.
5
Ensuring treatment fidelity in intervention studies: Developing a checklist and scoring system within a behaviour change paradigm.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):379-395. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12955. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
6
Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Nov;56(6):1114-1131. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12637. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Pragmatic fidelity measurement in youth service settings.
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 19;4:26334895231185380. doi: 10.1177/26334895231185380. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Accountability in Intervention Research: Developing a Fidelity Checklist of a Mental Health Intervention in Prisons.
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Oct;57(7):1288-1299. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00777-x. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Development of an audit checklist to evaluate treatment fidelity of a complex rehabilitation intervention.
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Apr;45(7):1131-1138. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2052977. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Establishing the dose of memory support to improve patient memory for treatment and treatment outcome.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101526. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101526. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
3
Patient constructive learning behavior in cognitive therapy: A pathway for improving patient memory for treatment?
Behav Res Ther. 2019 May;116:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Factors associated with patient recall of key information in ambulatory specialty care visits: Results of an innovative methodology.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191940. eCollection 2018.
6
Memory support strategies and bundles: A pathway to improving cognitive therapy for depression?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Mar;85(3):187-199. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000167.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
Evaluation of online and in-person motivational interviewing training for healthcare providers.
Fam Syst Health. 2016 Dec;34(4):357-366. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000214. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
9
Improving outcome for mental disorders by enhancing memory for treatment.
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jun;81:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
10
Ignoring Clustering in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Some Consequences for Model Fit and Standardized Parameter Estimates.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):518-43. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.933762.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验