Melbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Melbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e042246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042246.
To explore possible associations of treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), including T-cell-based and interleukin-6 inhibition (IL-6i)-based therapies, and the risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
STUDY DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Five treatment groups were selected from a United States Electronic Medical Records database of 283 756 patients with RA (mean follow-up, 5 years): never received bDMARD (No bDMARD, n=125 337), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi, n=34 873), IL-6i (n=1884), T-cell inhibitors (n=5935) and IL-6i+T cell inhibitor abatacept (n=1213). Probability and risk for T2DM were estimated with adjustment for relevant confounders.
In the cohort of 169 242 patients with a mean 4.5 years of follow-up and a mean 641 200 person years of follow-up, the adjusted probability of developing T2DM was significantly lower in the IL-6i (probability, 1%; 95% CI 0.6 to 2.0), T-cell inhibitor (probability, 3%; 95% CI 2.3 to 3.3) and IL-6i+T cell inhibitor (probability, 2%; 95% CI 0.1 to 2.9) groups than in the No bDMARD (probability, 5%; 95% CI 4.6 to 4.9) and TNFi (probability, 4%; 95% CI 3.7 to 4.7) groups. Compared with No bDMARD, the IL-6i and IL-6i+T cell inhibitor groups had 37% (95% CI of HR 0.42 to 0.96) and 34% (95% CI of HR 0.46 to 0.93) significantly lower risk for T2DM, respectively; there was no significant difference in risk in the TNFi (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06) and T-cell inhibitor (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.12) groups.
Treatment with IL-6i, with or without T-cell inhibitors, was associated with reduced risk for T2DM compared with TNFi or No bDMARDs; a less pronounced association was observed for the T-cell inhibitor abatacept.
探讨生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARD)治疗,包括 T 细胞靶向和白细胞介素 6 抑制(IL-6i)疗法,与类风湿关节炎(RA)患者 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)风险之间的可能关联。
研究设计、地点和参与者:从美国电子病历数据库中选择了 283756 例 RA 患者的 5 个治疗组(中位随访时间 5 年):从未接受 bDMARD(无 bDMARD,n=125337)、肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi,n=34873)、IL-6i(n=1884)、T 细胞抑制剂(n=5935)和 IL-6i+T 细胞抑制剂阿巴西普(n=1213)。通过调整相关混杂因素,估计 T2DM 的概率和风险。
在中位随访时间为 4.5 年,中位随访人数为 641200 人,169242 例患者的队列中,IL-6i(概率 1%;95%CI 0.6-2.0)、T 细胞抑制剂(概率 3%;95%CI 2.3-3.3)和 IL-6i+T 细胞抑制剂(概率 2%;95%CI 0.1-2.9)组的 T2DM 发生概率明显低于无 bDMARD(概率 5%;95%CI 4.6-4.9)和 TNFi(概率 4%;95%CI 3.7-4.7)组。与无 bDMARD 相比,IL-6i 和 IL-6i+T 细胞抑制剂组的 T2DM 风险分别降低 37%(95%CI 的 HR 0.42-0.96)和 34%(95%CI 的 HR 0.46-0.93);TNFi(HR 0.99;95%CI 0.93-1.06)和 T 细胞抑制剂(HR 0.96;95%CI 0.82-1.12)组的风险无显著差异。
与 TNFi 或无 bDMARD 相比,使用 IL-6i 联合或不联合 T 细胞抑制剂治疗与 T2DM 风险降低相关;而 T 细胞抑制剂阿巴西普的相关性则不那么明显。