Park Youn Young, Nam Soomin, Han Jeong Hee, Lee Jaeim, Cheong Chinock
Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Jun;100(6):347-355. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.6.347. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
Conservative treatment is the first-line therapy for acute colonic diverticulitis without severe complications, but treatment failure may increase hospitalization duration, medical costs, and morbidities. Usage of the modified Hinchey classification is insufficient to predict the outcome of conservative management. We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the modified Hinchey classification and to evaluate predictive factors such as inflammatory markers for the failure of conservative management.
Patients diagnosed with right colonic diverticulitis undergoing conservative treatment at 3 hospitals between 2017 and 2019 were included. Patients were categorized into conservative treatment success (n = 494) or failure (n = 46) groups. Clinical characteristics and blood inflammatory markers were assessed.
The conservative treatment failure group presented with more elderly patients (>50 years, P = 0.002), more recurrent episodes (P < 0.001), a higher lymphocyte count (P = 0.021), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P = 0.044), and higher modified Glasgow prognostic scores (P = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that age of >50 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-5.08; P = 0.008), recurrent episodes (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 2.38-9.61; P < 0.001), and higher CRP levels (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12; P = 0.001) were predictive factors for conservative treatment failure, but not the modified Hinchey grade (P = 0.159).
Age of >50 years, recurrent episodes, and CRP levels are potential predictors for conservative management failure of patients with right-sided colonic diverticulitis. Further studies are warranted to identify candidates requiring early surgical intervention.
对于无严重并发症的急性结肠憩室炎,保守治疗是一线治疗方法,但治疗失败可能会增加住院时间、医疗费用和发病率。改良的欣奇分类法在预测保守治疗结果方面的应用不足。我们旨在研究改良欣奇分类法的临床疗效,并评估诸如炎症标志物等保守治疗失败的预测因素。
纳入2017年至2019年间在3家医院接受保守治疗的右半结肠憩室炎患者。患者被分为保守治疗成功组(n = 494)和失败组(n = 46)。评估临床特征和血液炎症标志物。
保守治疗失败组老年患者(>50岁)更多(P = 0.002),复发次数更多(P < 0.001),淋巴细胞计数更高(P = 0.021),C反应蛋白(CRP)水平更高(P = 0.044),改良格拉斯哥预后评分更高(P = 0.021)。多因素分析显示,年龄>50岁(比值比[OR],2.54;95%置信区间[CI],1.27 - 5.08;P = 0.008)、复发次数(OR,4.78;95%CI,2.38 - 9.61;P < 0.001)和较高的CRP水平(OR,1.08;95%CI,1.03 - 1.12;P = 0.001)是保守治疗失败的预测因素,但改良欣奇分级不是(P = 0.159)。
年龄>50岁、复发次数和CRP水平是右半结肠憩室炎患者保守治疗失败的潜在预测因素。有必要进一步研究以确定需要早期手术干预的患者。