Ojea Manuel Rúa
Department of Psychosocial and Educational Analysis and Intervention, University of Vigo, Ourense, Spain.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2017 May 25;64(4-5):230-237. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2017.1326685.
This article presents to the following general objectives: 1) to apply different interventions, corresponding to 3 experimental groups (EG 1, 2, 3), composed of students with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD), 2) to compare the result found as a consequence of the intervention and 3) to analyze of the ad hoc pilot program (EG1) based on the categorical conceptual learning. The method used is a multivariate comparative analysis of the effectiveness of three programs (with an analysis of 1 factor, across 4 measures, represented by conceptual learning categories, measured through a longitudinal study of 3-month time intervals (total= 12 months). Study involved 18 participants, distributed in 3 experimental groups, each experimental group is made up of 6 students with autistic spectrum disorders across three diagnostic levels, aged between 4 and 15 years, of which 14 are male and 4 are female. Results the improvements found in the participants of experimental group (EG1) in relation to the other two experimental groups (EG2, 3) are remarkable, especially regarding the data found in the fourth measure of the factor of the study. The conclusions show the benefits of educational programs based on the previous evaluation of the participants' needs and the contributions of the neuropsychology of individual development, as well as social and cultural dimensions.
1)对由自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)学生组成的3个实验组(EG1、2、3)实施不同干预措施;2)比较干预措施产生的结果;3)基于分类概念学习对特设试点项目(EG1)进行分析。所采用的方法是对三个项目的有效性进行多变量比较分析(分析1个因素,涵盖4项指标,由概念学习类别表示,通过为期3个月时间间隔的纵向研究进行测量(总计 = 12个月))。研究涉及18名参与者,分布在3个实验组中,每个实验组由6名自闭症谱系障碍学生组成,涵盖三个诊断水平,年龄在4至15岁之间,其中14名是男性,4名是女性。结果表明,实验组(EG1)的参与者相对于其他两个实验组(EG2、3)所取得的进步显著,特别是在研究因素的第四项指标中所发现的数据方面。结论显示了基于对参与者需求的先前评估以及个体发展的神经心理学以及社会和文化维度的贡献的教育项目的益处。