Zhou Nan, Ma Mingliang, Liu Hongzhi, Zhao Dongyang, Wang Zhigang
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P.R.China.
.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 15;35(6):678-683. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101066.
To explore the efficacy and advantages of the lower extremity axial distractor assisted closed reduction and retrograde intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of distal femoral fractures.
The clinical data of 49 patients with distal femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nail internal fixation between April 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of intraoperative reduction, the patients were divided into trial group (29 cases, using lower extremity axial distractor to assist closed reduction) and control group (20 cases, using free-hand retraction reduction). There was no significant difference in general information between the two groups ( >0.05), such as gender, age, side of injury, cause of injury, and fracture classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and callus formation time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The function of the affected limb was evaluated according to the Schatzker-Lambert standard at 1 year after operation.
All patients successfully completed the operation. In the control group, there was 1 case with open reduction and internal fixation, and the rest of the two groups were closed reduction. There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency between the two groups ( >0.05). There was no complication such as vascular or nerve injury and iatrogenic fracture, during and after operation, and the incisions healed by first intention. Except for 2 patients in the trial group who were lost to follow-up at 3 months after operation, the rest of the patients were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 16.0 months. There was no significant difference in the callus formation time between the two groups ( =2.195, =0.145). During the follow-up, postoperative knee joint stiffness occurred in 1 case in the control group, which improved by strengthening the knee joint function exercise and removing the internal fixator; the rest were not found to be associated with delayed or nonunion fractures, knee stiffness, and internal fixation complication. The function of the affected limb was evaluated according to the Schatzker-Lambert standard at 1 year after operation, the trial group achieved excellent results in 22 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 96.3%; in the control group, the results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate was 95.0%; showing no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups ( =0.451, =0.502).
The lower extremity axial distractor assisted closed reduction and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of distal femoral fractures is convenient, which has satisfactory efficacy.
探讨下肢轴向撑开器辅助闭合复位逆行髓内钉内固定治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效及优势。
回顾性分析2016年4月至2018年12月采用逆行髓内钉内固定治疗的49例股骨远端骨折患者的临床资料。根据术中复位方法的不同,将患者分为试验组(29例,采用下肢轴向撑开器辅助闭合复位)和对照组(20例,采用徒手牵拉复位)。两组患者的一般资料,如性别、年龄、受伤侧别、受伤原因及骨折分型等,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数及骨痂形成时间。术后1年根据Schatzker-Lambert标准评估患侧肢体功能。
所有患者均顺利完成手术。对照组有1例行切开复位内固定,其余两组均为闭合复位。两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及术中透视次数差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术中及术后均未发生血管或神经损伤、医源性骨折等并发症,切口均一期愈合。试验组除2例患者术后3个月失访外,其余患者均获随访12 - 36个月,平均16.0个月。两组骨痂形成时间差异无统计学意义(=2.195,=0.145)。随访期间,对照组有1例出现术后膝关节僵硬,经加强膝关节功能锻炼及取出内固定后好转;其余未发现与骨折延迟愈合或不愈合、膝关节僵硬及内固定相关并发症。术后1年根据Schatzker-Lambert标准评估患侧肢体功能,试验组优22例,良4例,可1例,优良率为96.3%;对照组优16例,良3例,可1例,优良率为95.0%;两组优良率差异无统计学意义(=0.451,=0.502)。
下肢轴向撑开器辅助闭合复位逆行髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折操作简便,疗效满意。