Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8238, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Nov;74(11):2925-2932. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.063. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
Loss of knee extension causes significant impairment. Though nerve-based reconstruction is preferable in cases of femoral nerve palsy or injury, these surgeries are not always appropriate if the pathology involves the quadriceps muscles or presentation too late for muscle reinnervation. Muscle transfers are another option that has been underutilized in the lower extremity. We describe the successful restoration of knee extension by adductor magnus muscle transfer without functional donor morbidity, along with anatomical considerations.
Ten fresh frozen cadaveric lower limbs were dissected at the groin and thigh. In addition, three patients presented with femoral nerve palsy for which nerve-based reconstruction was not appropriate because of late presentation. In these patients, adductor magnus muscle transfers were performed, along with sartorius, gracilis, and tensor fasciae latae transfers if available and healthy.
In cadavers, the pedicle for the adductor magnus is at the level of the gracilis and adequate for muscle transfer, with sufficient weavable tendon length. The only major structure at risk is the femoral neurovascular bundle, which is in a reliable anatomic position. Two patients recovered 4/5 active knee extension and ambulation without assistive devices. A third required reoperation for a loosened tendon weave, after which the noted improved stability and strength with ambulation but did not regain strong active knee extension and continued to require a cane.
We present a novel reconstructive approach for loss of quadriceps function in patients, which yields good clinical outcomes, with anatomic and technical details to demonstrate the utility of this technique. Ongoing evaluation of optimal technique and rehabilitation to maximize functional outcomes is still needed.
膝关节伸展丧失会导致显著的功能障碍。尽管在股神经麻痹或损伤的情况下,基于神经的重建是首选,但如果病理涉及股四头肌或出现太晚以至于无法进行肌肉再支配,这些手术并不总是合适的。肌肉转移是下肢另一种未得到充分利用的选择。我们描述了通过使用内收大肌转移来成功恢复膝关节伸展,而不会导致功能性供体损伤,并探讨了相关解剖学问题。
在腹股沟和大腿处解剖了 10 个新鲜冷冻的尸体下肢。此外,还有 3 名患者出现股神经麻痹,由于出现太晚,不适合进行基于神经的重建。在这些患者中,进行了内收大肌转移,如果有且健康的话,还进行了缝匠肌、股薄肌和阔筋膜张肌转移。
在尸体中,内收大肌的蒂位于股薄肌水平,足以进行肌肉转移,并且有足够的可编织肌腱长度。唯一有风险的主要结构是股神经血管束,它位于可靠的解剖位置。2 名患者在没有辅助设备的情况下恢复了 4/5 的主动膝关节伸展和步行能力。第 3 名患者因松动的肌腱编织需要再次手术,之后在步行时明显改善了稳定性和力量,但没有恢复到强有力的主动膝关节伸展,仍需要使用手杖。
我们提出了一种新颖的重建方法,用于治疗股四头肌功能丧失的患者,该方法可获得良好的临床结果,并提供了解剖学和技术细节,以证明该技术的实用性。仍需要对最佳技术和康复方法进行持续评估,以最大限度地提高功能结果。