Esfahani Hooman, Khazaeipour Zahra, Safaie Arash, Aghili Seyed Mojtaba
Prehospital and Hospital Emergency Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021 Apr;9(2):73-79. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.85949.
To compare the ketamine efficacy at a sub-dissociative morphine dose to reduce pain in isolated limb traumatic injuries.
A double-blind randomized clinical trial study was carried out on patients referred to emergency departments (EDs) due to isolated limb traumatic injuries. Eligible patients were divided into two groups which one group received 0.1 mg/kg ketamine and the other group received 0.05 mg/kg morphine, intravenously. An observed side effect includes pain scores and vital signs were recorded at baseline of every 5 minutes for 30 minutes.
Totally, 73 patients with the mean age of 32.9±10.4 were enrolled of whom 59 (80.8%) individuals were men. The baseline characteristics difference of the two study groups was not statistically significant. The results showed that the change of mean pain score was -6.2 (95% CI: -5.72 to -6.69) points in the group receiving ketamine compared to -5.8 (95%CI: -5.15 to - 6.48) in the group who were administered morphine. At all assessed checkpoints, the pain mean score was lower in the ketamine group than in the morphine group (<0.05); the mean of total pain reduction was greater in the ketamine group during the observation period compared with patients who received morphine (=0.002).
The study findings suggest that the sub-dissociative ketamine efficacy in controlling of the acute pain is not lower than morphine sulfate in patients with isolated limb trauma in ED's. Thus, it can be considered as a safe and effective alternative approach.
比较亚麻醉剂量氯胺酮与吗啡在减轻孤立性肢体创伤性损伤疼痛方面的疗效。
对因孤立性肢体创伤性损伤转诊至急诊科的患者进行了一项双盲随机临床试验研究。符合条件的患者分为两组,一组静脉注射0.1mg/kg氯胺酮,另一组静脉注射0.05mg/kg吗啡。观察的副作用包括疼痛评分,并在30分钟内每5分钟记录一次基线生命体征。
共纳入73例患者,平均年龄32.9±10.4岁,其中59例(80.8%)为男性。两个研究组的基线特征差异无统计学意义。结果显示,接受氯胺酮治疗组的平均疼痛评分变化为-6.2(95%CI:-5.72至-6.69)分,而接受吗啡治疗组为-5.8(95%CI:-5.15至-6.48)分。在所有评估的检查点,氯胺酮组的疼痛平均评分均低于吗啡组(<0.05);与接受吗啡治疗的患者相比,氯胺酮组在观察期内的总疼痛减轻平均值更大(=0.002)。
研究结果表明,在急诊科孤立性肢体创伤患者中,亚麻醉剂量氯胺酮控制急性疼痛的疗效不低于硫酸吗啡。因此,它可被视为一种安全有效的替代方法。