• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用钛合金长入型假体及植骨术进行翻修全髋关节置换术治疗骨水泥型股骨部件松动失败病例

Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.

作者信息

Gustilo R B, Pasternak H S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Oct(235):111-9.

PMID:3416518
Abstract

Fifty-seven hips (55 patients) had revision for failed cemented femoral component loosening using titanium ingrowth femoral components and cancellous bone grafting. The patients' average age was 59 years (range, 25-86 years), and the average follow-up period was 2.8 years (range, two to six years). The preoperative hip score averaged 45.5 (range, 10.0-80.7) and the postoperative hip score averaged 82.5 (range, 43.0-100.0). Complications included dislocation (4.0%), infection (4.0%, one recurrence from a previously infected hip and one acute hematogenous infection), and a 4.0% revision rate for loose femoral component. Another patient had a revision for a loose acetabular component. All parameters of hip function (i.e., pain, limp, activities of daily living, use of support, and distance walked) improved with time. Femoral component loosening is classified into four types based on the severity of loosening and instability. In Type I there is minimal endosteal or inner cortical bone loss, i.e., loosening from the cement-metal-bone interface or a broken stem (seven hips). In Type II there is proximal canal enlargement with cortical thinning of 50% or more and sometimes a lateral wall defect with an intact circumferential wall (23 hips). In Type III there is a posteromedial wall defect involving the lesser trochanter (23 hips). In Type IV there is total proximal circumferential bone loss in varying distances below the lesser trochanter (three hips). The Harris hip scores for the four groups were 93.0, 83.0, 80.0, and 78.0, respectively.

摘要

57例髋关节(55例患者)因骨水泥型股骨假体松动失败,采用钛合金长入型股骨假体及松质骨植骨进行翻修。患者平均年龄59岁(范围25 - 86岁),平均随访时间2.8年(范围2 - 6年)。术前髋关节评分平均为45.5(范围10.0 - 80.7),术后髋关节评分平均为82.5(范围43.0 - 100.0)。并发症包括脱位(4.0%)、感染(4.0%,1例为既往感染髋关节复发,1例为急性血源性感染)以及股骨假体松动翻修率为4.0%。另1例患者因髋臼假体松动进行了翻修。髋关节功能的所有参数(即疼痛、跛行、日常生活活动、辅助器具使用及行走距离)均随时间改善。股骨假体松动根据松动和不稳定的严重程度分为四种类型。I型为骨内膜或内皮质骨丢失极少,即从骨水泥 - 金属 - 骨界面松动或假体柄折断(7例髋关节)。II型为近端髓腔扩大,皮质变薄50%或更多,有时伴有完整圆周壁的外侧壁缺损(23例髋关节)。III型为涉及小转子的后内侧壁缺损(23例髋关节)。IV型为小转子下方不同距离处近端圆周骨完全丢失(3例髋关节)。四组的Harris髋关节评分分别为93.0、83.0、80.0和78.0。

相似文献

1
Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.采用钛合金长入型假体及植骨术进行翻修全髋关节置换术治疗骨水泥型股骨部件松动失败病例
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Oct(235):111-9.
2
[Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].[金属网保护下的骨内膜同种异体骨移植用于全髋关节置换翻修术中的股骨重建。19例患者,平均随访83个月]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83(4):360-7.
3
[Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].[申克无骨水泥股骨假体的长期结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2004;71(2):93-100.
4
[Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].[采用钛制骨水泥型直柄股骨干假体取得良好长期效果]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Sep;105(9):804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0425-4.
5
[Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].[髋关节置换术失败后翻修全髋关节置换术类型的选择]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Mar;18(2):135-7.
6
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.
7
[Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].[在翻修全髋关节置换术中是否应系统性翻修一体式骨水泥柄?一项前瞻性评估]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Nov;94(7):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
8
Revision of femoral component loosening with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting.使用钛长入型假体和骨移植对股骨部件松动进行翻修。
Instr Course Lect. 1986;35:161-3.
9
Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.使用模块化翻修假体MRP-TITAN翻修柄进行非骨水泥型股骨翻修关节成形术。
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007 Mar;19(1):56-77. doi: 10.1007/s00064-007-1195-5.
10
Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients.未骨水泥型锥形柄用于转子间截骨失败后的良好生存率:45例患者平均16年随访研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1081-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0444-2. Epub 2007 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of plain radiographs for periprosthetic joint infections of the hip: a literature review.髋关节假体周围关节感染的平片诊断和预后相关性:文献回顾。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jun 8;29(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01891-8.
2
Quantitative Assessment of Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty Based on 3D Modeling: The Area Increase Ratio () Method.基于三维建模的髋关节翻修术中髋臼缺损的定量评估:面积增加率()法
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;11(4):341. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040341.
3
Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
采用广泛多孔涂层柄和皮质骨支柱同种异体移植物进行严重股骨骨缺损的 THA 翻修,随访至少 8 年。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 8;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03250-0.
4
Acetabular defect classification and management : Revision arthroplasty of the acetabular cup based on 3-point fixation.髋臼缺损的分类与处理:基于三点固定的髋臼杯翻修术
Orthopade. 2020 May;49(5):432-442. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03895-8.
5
Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.髋臼补片强化环联合同种异体骨治疗严重髋臼骨缺损
Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):561-571. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4142-1. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Acetabular Cup Revision Arthroplasty Using Morselized Impaction Allograft.使用碎骨打压植骨进行髋臼杯翻修关节成形术
Hip Pelvis. 2018 Jun;30(2):65-77. doi: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.65. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.使用初次非骨水泥型股骨柄进行股骨翻修术:文献系统综述
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Apr;102(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
8
Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.三维成像时代的髋臼缺损分类及个性化治疗方案
Orthopade. 2017 Feb;46(2):168-178. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3378-y.
9
Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.使用模块化非骨水泥股骨柄进行髋关节翻修置换术的中期结果
Hip Pelvis. 2015 Sep;27(3):135-40. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.135. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
10
Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss.简要分类:髋臼骨缺损的帕罗斯基分类法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3725-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4. Epub 2013 Aug 31.