School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois, 61790-4120, USA.
Ecology. 2021 Oct;102(10):e03452. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3452. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Parasite dilution occurs in varied systems, via multiple potential mechanisms. We used laboratory manipulation and field surveys to test for invader-induced parasite dilution via two specific mechanisms: host-host competition and encounter reduction. In the laboratory, single Aedes triseriatus larvae were exposed to one of eight combinations of: parasitic Ascogregarina barretti, +/-1 cohabiting Aedes albopictus larva during parasite exposure, and +/-1 cohabiting A. albopictus larva after infectious parasite removal. Larval infection intensity (predicted to decrease via dilution by encounter reduction) was not significantly affected by A. albopictus. Adult infection prevalence and intensity (predicted to decrease via dilution by host-host competition) were significantly greater with A. albopictus, suggesting parasite amplification by interspecific competition, an effect potentially mediated by competition increasing A. triseriatus development time. In the field, we tested for effects of potential dilution host abundances on prevalence and abundance of A. barretti in A. triseriatus larvae. Piecewise path analysis yielded no evidence of host-host competition impacting parasitism in the field, but instead indicated a significant direct negative effect of Aedes spp. abundance on parasite abundance in A. triseriatus, which is consistent with dilution via encounter reduction in the field, but only in tree holes, not in man-made containers. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that a noncompetent invader can alter the native host-parasite relationship, but our laboratory and field data yield differing results. This difference is likely due to laboratory experiment testing for per capita effects of dilution hosts on parasitism, but field analysis testing for effects of dilution host abundance on parasitism. Individually, host-host competition with the invader amplifies, rather than dilutes, parasite success. In contrast, our path analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that dilution of parasitism results from increased abundance of noncompetent hosts in the field.
寄生虫稀释发生在各种系统中,通过多种潜在机制。我们使用实验室操作和现场调查来测试通过两种特定机制引起的入侵寄生虫稀释:宿主-宿主竞争和遭遇减少。在实验室中,单个 Aedes triseriatus 幼虫暴露于八种组合之一:寄生性 Ascogregarina barretti,在寄生虫暴露期间 +/-1 个共栖的 Aedes albopictus 幼虫,以及在传染性寄生虫去除后 +/-1 个共栖的 A. albopictus 幼虫。幼虫感染强度(预计通过遭遇减少而稀释减少)不受 A. albopictus 的显著影响。成虫感染流行率和强度(预计通过宿主-宿主竞争稀释而降低)随着 A. albopictus 的增加而显著增加,这表明种间竞争导致寄生虫放大,这种效应可能通过增加 A. triseriatus 发育时间来介导。在野外,我们测试了潜在稀释宿主丰度对 A. triseriatus 幼虫中 A. barretti 流行率和丰度的影响。分段路径分析没有证据表明宿主-宿主竞争对野外寄生虫产生影响,但表明 Aedes spp.丰度对 A. triseriatus 寄生虫丰度有显著的直接负影响,这与野外遭遇减少导致的稀释一致,但仅在树洞而不在人造容器中。我们的结果与假设一致,即非竞争入侵者可以改变本地宿主-寄生虫关系,但我们的实验室和现场数据得出了不同的结果。这种差异可能是由于实验室实验测试了稀释宿主对寄生虫的人均影响,而现场分析测试了稀释宿主丰度对寄生虫的影响。单独地,与入侵者的宿主-宿主竞争放大而不是稀释寄生虫的成功。相比之下,我们的路径分析与假设一致,即寄生虫稀释是由于野外非竞争宿主丰度增加所致。