文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

CPX-351 与 7+3 阿糖胞苷和柔红霉素化疗治疗新诊断的高危或继发性急性髓系白血病老年患者:一项随机、开放标签、多中心、3 期临床试验的 5 年结果。

CPX-351 versus 7+3 cytarabine and daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia: 5-year results of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2021 Jul;8(7):e481-e491. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00134-4.


DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00134-4
PMID:34171279
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daunorubicin and cytarabine are used as standard induction chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. Primary analysis of the phase 3 trial in adults aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia provided support for approval of CPX-351 by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. We describe the prospectively planned final 5-year follow-up results. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done across 39 academic and regional cancer centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 60-75 years and had a pathological diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia according to WHO 2008 criteria, no previous induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by age and acute myeloid leukaemia subtype) to receive up to two induction cycles of CPX-351 (100 units/m administered as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 3, and 5; on days 1 and 3 for the second induction) or standard chemotherapy (cytarabine 100 mg/m per day continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days plus intravenous daunorubicin 60 mg/m on days 1, 2, and 3 [7+3]; cytarabine for 5 days and daunorubicin on days 1 and 2 for the second induction [5+2]). Patients with complete remission or complete remission with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery could receive up to tw cycles of consolidation therapy with CPX-351 (65 units/m 90-min infusion on days 1 and 3) or chemotherapy (5+2, same dosage as in the second induction cycle). The primary outcome was overall survival analysed in all randomly assigned patients. No additional adverse events were collected with long-term follow-up, except data for deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01696084, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2012, and Nov 11, 2014, 309 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CPX-351 (153 patients) or 7+3 (156 patients). At a median follow-up of 60·91 months (IQR 60·06-62·98) in the CPX-351 group and 59·93 months (59·73-60·50) in the 7+3 group, median overall survival was 9·33 months (95% CI 6·37-11·86) with CPX-351 and 5·95 months (4·99-7·75) with 7+3 (HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·55-0·91). 5-year overall survival was 18% (95% CI 12-25%) in the CPX-351 group and 8% (4-13%) in the 7+3 group. The most common cause of death in both groups was progressive leukaemia (70 [56%] of 124 deaths in the CPX-351 group and 74 [53%] of 140 deaths in the 7+3 group). Six (5%) of 124 deaths in the CPX-351 group and seven (5%) of 140 deaths in the 7+3 group were considered related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: After 5 years of follow-up, the improved overall survival with CPX-351 versus 7+3 was maintained, which supports the previous evidence that CPX-351 can contribute to long-term remission and improved overall survival in patients aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia. FUNDING: Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

摘要

背景:柔红霉素和阿糖胞苷被用作急性髓系白血病患者的标准诱导化疗药物。CPX-351 是一种双联药物脂质体封装物,其中柔红霉素和阿糖胞苷以协同 1:5 的摩尔比封装。CPX-351 在 60-75 岁新诊断的高危或继发性急性髓系白血病成人中的 3 期试验的主要分析结果支持了 CPX-351 获得美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局的批准。我们描述了前瞻性计划的最终 5 年随访结果。

方法:这是一项在美国和加拿大的 39 个学术和区域癌症中心进行的随机、开放标签、多中心、3 期临床试验。合格患者年龄在 60-75 岁之间,根据世界卫生组织 2008 年标准,经病理学诊断为急性髓系白血病,无先前诱导治疗急性髓系白血病,东部肿瘤协作组表现状态为 0-2。患者按 1:1(按年龄和急性髓系白血病亚型分层)随机分配,接受最多两个诱导周期的 CPX-351(100 单位/m 作为 90 分钟静脉输注,每天 1、3 和 5 天;第二次诱导时为第 1 和第 3 天)或标准化疗(阿糖胞苷 100 mg/m 每天连续静脉输注 7 天,每天 1、2 和 3 天静脉注射柔红霉素 60 mg/m[7+3];第二次诱导时为阿糖胞苷 5 天,柔红霉素第 1 和第 2 天)。完全缓解或不完全中性粒细胞或血小板恢复的完全缓解患者可以接受最多两个周期的 CPX-351 巩固治疗(第 1 和第 3 天 65 单位/m 90 分钟输注)或化疗(5+2,与第二次诱导周期相同剂量)。主要终点是所有随机分配患者的总生存率。除死亡数据外,在长期随访期间没有额外的不良事件收集。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT01696084,已经完成。

结果:2012 年 12 月 20 日至 2014 年 11 月 11 日,309 例新诊断的高危或继发性急性髓系白血病患者入组并随机分配接受 CPX-351(153 例)或 7+3(156 例)。在 CPX-351 组的中位随访 60.91 个月(IQR 60.06-62.98)和 7+3 组的中位随访 59.93 个月(59.73-60.50)中,CPX-351 的中位总生存期为 9.33 个月(95%CI 6.37-11.86),7+3 为 5.95 个月(4.99-7.75)(HR 0.70,95%CI 0.55-0.91)。CPX-351 组的 5 年总生存率为 18%(95%CI 12-25%),7+3 组为 8%(4-13%)。两组中最常见的死亡原因是进行性白血病(CPX-351 组 124 例死亡中有 70 例[56%],7+3 组 140 例死亡中有 74 例[53%])。CPX-351 组 124 例死亡中有 6 例(5%)和 7+3 组 140 例死亡中有 7 例(5%)被认为与研究治疗有关。

解释:经过 5 年的随访,CPX-351 与 7+3 相比,总生存率的改善得到了维持,这支持了之前的证据,即 CPX-351 可以为 60-75 岁新诊断的高危或继发性急性髓系白血病患者带来长期缓解和总体生存的改善。

资助:爵士制药公司。

相似文献

[1]
CPX-351 versus 7+3 cytarabine and daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia: 5-year results of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Haematol. 2021-7

[2]
Addition of sorafenib versus placebo to standard therapy in patients aged 60 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (SORAML): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2015-11-6

[3]
Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML.

J Hematol Oncol. 2021-7-13

[4]
CPX-351 in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study.

Lancet Haematol. 2023-7

[5]
CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

J Clin Oncol. 2018-7-19

[6]
Venetoclax plus 3 + 7 daunorubicin and cytarabine chemotherapy as first-line treatment for adults with acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Lancet Haematol. 2022-6

[7]
Intensive chemotherapy with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AMLSG 09-09): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Haematol. 2023-7

[8]
Idarubicin, cytarabine, and nivolumab in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a single-arm, phase 2 study.

Lancet Haematol. 2019-9

[9]
10-day decitabine versus 3 + 7 chemotherapy followed by allografting in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Haematol. 2023-11

[10]
Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: phase 2 results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 1/2 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2017-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
Identification of an Ara-C resistance-related gene risk score and the role of S100A4 in AML via NR6A1-dependent activation and p53 regulation.

Front Pharmacol. 2025-6-13

[2]
Feasibility of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with CPX-351: report from a single center.

Ann Hematol. 2025-6-23

[3]
Advances in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Implications for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Biomedicines. 2025-5-18

[4]
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of CPX- 351 in secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia between the registrative trial and a real-life study.

Ann Hematol. 2025-5

[5]
The Role of CPX-351 in the Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment Landscape: Mechanism of Action, Efficacy, and Safety.

Drugs. 2025-5-10

[6]
Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Venetoclax-Based Regimens in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is the Chemotherapy Era Ending?

J Clin Med. 2025-4-17

[7]
Real-world experience with first-line CPX-351 treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia - long-term follow-up with focus on younger patients.

Blood Cancer J. 2025-4-8

[8]
VEN in combination with 10-day DEC in newly diagnosed elderly or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: long term follow-up of a phase 2 trial.

Blood Cancer J. 2025-4-2

[9]
Comparative analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with therapy-related and de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia A retrospective study.

Sci Rep. 2025-3-31

[10]
Ratifying the efficacy and safety of intensive induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia by the Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group consensus approach.

Intern Med J. 2025-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索