Ferrer-Fàbrega Joana, Sampson-Dávila Jaime, Forner Alejandro, Sapena Victor, Díaz Alba, Vilana Ramón, Navasa Miquel, Fondevila Constantino, Miquel Rosa, Ayuso Carmen, García-Valdecasas Juan Carlos, Bruix Jordi, Reig María, Fuster Josep
Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver and Pancreatic Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute Clínic of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDiM), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Clínic Liver Cancer Group (BCLC), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver and Pancreatic Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute Clínic of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDiM), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Hepatol. 2021 Nov;75(5):1154-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Defining optimum management of patients progressing beyond Milan criteria on the waiting list is a controversial topic. Our aim was to determine whether the policy of allowing a limited progression beyond enlistment criteria permits acceptable post-transplant outcomes in terms of survival and recurrence.
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma included on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between January 1989 and December 2016 were analysed. Tumour features were assessed at inclusion on the waiting list, before OLT and at explant pathology. Patients were retained on the waiting list despite exceeding enlistment criteria if not presenting with macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread or cancer-related symptoms.
A total of 495 patients constituted the target population. Comparison between the Milan-in (n = 434) and Milan-out (n = 61) groups showed statistically significant differences in: largest tumour size; BCLC stage; patients treated before OLT; alpha-fetoprotein, and time on the waiting list. Milan-out patients showed a significantly higher number of poorly differentiated nodules, satellitosis and microscopic vascular invasion. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rate was 89.6%, 82.5%, 75%, and 55.5%, vs. 83.6%, 70.5%, 65.5%, and 53.9% for Milan-in/Milan-out patients, respectively. Recurrence rates at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years were 1.2%, 3.3%, 5.5%, and 10.8% vs. 7.1% 14.5%, 23%, and 23% for Milan-in and Milan-out patients, respectively (p <0.01).
This study shows that although limited tumour progression without reaching major adverse predictors (vascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, cancer symptoms) has an expected impact on recurrence rate, overall survival remains above the minimum proposed benchmark of 65% at 5 years. The clinically relevant increase in tumour recurrence must be considered when analysing the benefit of this approach in the face of limited organ supply.
When considering orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, optimum results are achieved when transplanting patients within the Milan criteria. However, the most appropriate strategy for patients who progress beyond these criteria while on the waiting list is still unclear. Herein, we show that transplantation is associated with acceptable overall survival in select patients who progress beyond the Milan criteria, although recurrence rates were notably higher. Therefore, the assessment of transplantation viability in these patients must consider the availability of organs and the impact on other patient categories.
确定对等待名单上超出米兰标准的患者的最佳管理方案是一个有争议的话题。我们的目的是确定允许在入组标准之外有有限进展的政策在生存和复发方面是否能带来可接受的移植后结果。
分析了1989年1月至2016年12月期间等待原位肝移植(OLT)的肝细胞癌患者。在列入等待名单时、OLT前以及切除标本病理检查时评估肿瘤特征。如果患者没有出现大血管侵犯、肝外扩散或癌症相关症状,即使超过入组标准也可保留在等待名单上。
共有495名患者构成目标人群。米兰标准内(n = 434)和米兰标准外(n = 61)两组之间在以下方面存在统计学显著差异:最大肿瘤大小;BCLC分期;OLT前接受治疗的患者;甲胎蛋白以及等待名单上的时间。米兰标准外的患者显示出低分化结节、卫星灶和微小血管侵犯的数量明显更多。米兰标准内/米兰标准外患者的1年、3年、5年和10年生存率分别为89.6%、82.5%、75%和55.5%,而米兰标准外患者分别为83.6%、70.5%、65.5%和53.9%。米兰标准内和米兰标准外患者1年、3年、5年和10年的复发率分别为1.2%、3.3%、5.5%和10.8%,而米兰标准外患者分别为7.1%、14.5%、23%和23%(p<0.01)。
本研究表明,尽管肿瘤有限进展但未达到主要不良预测指标(血管侵犯、肝外扩散、癌症症状)会对复发率产生预期影响,但5年总体生存率仍高于提议的最低基准65%。在面对器官供应有限的情况下分析这种方法的益处时,必须考虑肿瘤复发在临床上的相关增加。
在考虑对肝细胞癌患者进行原位肝移植时,按照米兰标准进行移植可取得最佳效果。然而,对于在等待名单上超出这些标准的患者,最合适的策略仍不明确。在此,我们表明,对于超出米兰标准的特定患者,移植与可接受的总体生存率相关,尽管复发率明显更高。因此,评估这些患者的移植可行性时必须考虑器官的可用性以及对其他患者类别的影响。