Department of Biogeography and Global Change, National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN-CSIC), Serrano 155 bis, 23006 Madrid, Spain.
US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 1;793:148399. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148399. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
Unimodal response of tree species richness to increases in aboveground productivity is evident in grasslands but to a lesser extent in forests, where confounding factors (e.g., abiotic factors and management regimes) may alter the response and compromise the delivery of ecosystem services. We hypothesize that unimodal response of biomass accumulation through increased species richness leads to greater tree above ground carbon (AGC) stocks and thus climate regulation but not necessarily higher timber volume production for human consumption across portions of North American and European forests. We first evaluated the biodiversity-productivity pattern and assessed if the addition of potential confounding variables altered the response. Afterwards, we integrated direct and indirect effects of species richness and confounding factors in the modelling of aboveground carbon stock and timber volume. We confirm an increase in carbon stocks concomitant with an increase in tree species richness up to an optimum biomass value in both regions. Tree species richness had a marginal effect on both aboveground carbon stocks and timber volume with a trade-off in the eastern US. Biomass accumulation is lower in tree plantations than in natural forests, although volume increased with species richness. Naturally-regenerated forests needed as much as double the number of tree species than plantations to reach the same carbon stocks. Distinct ecosystem services (AGC and timber volume) showed unique pathways of achieving their maximum provisioning. As increasing forest resilience to global change requires a fundamental understanding of how tree species combine with changing climatic conditions to drive the provisioning of various ecosystem services, further examination of this study's findings across additional biogeographical regions may lead the way to unraveling such dynamics and empowering adaptive management.
乔木物种丰富度对地上生产力增加的单峰响应在草原中很明显,但在森林中则不那么明显,在森林中,混杂因素(如非生物因素和管理模式)可能会改变响应,并损害生态系统服务的提供。我们假设,通过增加物种丰富度来实现生物量积累的单峰响应会导致更高的树木地上碳(AGC)储量,从而更好地调节气候,但不一定会增加北美的部分地区和欧洲森林的木材体积产量供人类消费。我们首先评估了生物多样性-生产力模式,并评估了添加潜在混杂变量是否改变了响应。之后,我们在建模地上碳储量和木材体积时,整合了物种丰富度和混杂因素的直接和间接效应。我们证实,在两个地区,随着树木物种丰富度的增加,碳储量都会伴随着生物量的增加而增加,直到达到最佳生物量值。在东美的情况下,物种丰富度对地上碳储量和木材体积都有边际效应,存在权衡。人工林的生物量积累低于天然林,尽管体积随物种丰富度增加而增加。自然再生林达到相同碳储量所需的树种数量是人工林的两倍。不同的生态系统服务(AGC 和木材体积)显示出实现其最大供应的独特途径。由于提高森林对全球变化的恢复力需要从根本上了解树种如何与不断变化的气候条件相结合,以推动各种生态系统服务的提供,因此在更多的生物地理区域进一步研究本研究的结果可能会为揭示这种动态和赋予适应性管理提供指导。