Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 13;39(31):4283-4290. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.036. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
Between 2015 and 2018 The Netherlands experienced increases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) serogroup W (MenW), from 0.02 cases/100,000 people between 2010 and 2014 up to 0.5 cases/100,000 in 2017. Therefore in 2018 the MenACWY vaccination was introduced in the National Immunisation Programme (NIP) and a catch-up campaign was initiated among adolescents. This study aimed to gain insight into the decision-making process within households regarding the MenACWY vaccination. The focus was on the differences in the decision-making process of parents and adolescents and of those that had accepted the MenACWY vaccination and those that had not, in order to assess how these types of decisions are made within households.
We conducted a total of 38 semi-structured interviews in 20 households (7 not vaccinated) with 20 parents and 18 adolescents (18 dyads) across The Netherlands concerning their decision-making process. Interview guides were constructed based on the Precaution Adaption Process (PAP) model. We performed thematic analysis using qualitative data analysis software (MAXQDA).
Parents are the main actors in the household decision-making process regarding the MenACWY vaccination. Parents start their decision-making process before adolescents are even aware of the issue. Households in the study took different approaches in involving the adolescent in the decision-making, resulting in three styles of household decision-making: parents decide without the adolescent, parents involve the adolescent, or parents leave it up to the adolescent to decide.
Parents influence adolescent reasoning, engagement and involvement during the MenACWY vaccination decision-making. And this is the case both among those that have accepted and rejected the MenACWY vaccination. Adolescent engagement with the MenACWY vaccination decision-making is either short-lived or non-existent. However, the moment offers opportunities to engage adolescents on vaccinations and decision-making, with parents as key figures to promote this.
2015 年至 2018 年期间,荷兰侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病(MenW)血清群病例数增加,从 2010 年至 2014 年的 0.02 例/10 万人上升至 2017 年的 0.5 例/10 万人。因此,2018 年在国家免疫计划(NIP)中引入了 MenACWY 疫苗接种,并针对青少年启动了一项补种运动。本研究旨在深入了解家庭内部在 MenACWY 疫苗接种方面的决策过程。重点是父母和青少年之间、已接受 MenACWY 疫苗接种者和未接受者之间决策过程的差异,以评估家庭内部如何做出这些类型的决策。
我们在荷兰各地的 20 个家庭(7 个未接种疫苗)中进行了总共 38 次半结构化访谈(20 名父母和 18 名青少年(18 对)),了解他们的决策过程。访谈指南是基于预防适应过程(PAP)模型构建的。我们使用定性数据分析软件(MAXQDA)进行主题分析。
父母是家庭中关于 MenACWY 疫苗接种决策的主要决策者。父母在青少年甚至意识到这个问题之前就开始了他们的决策过程。研究中的家庭在让青少年参与决策方面采取了不同的方法,导致了三种家庭决策风格:父母在没有青少年参与的情况下做出决定、父母让青少年参与决策、或父母让青少年自己决定。
父母影响青少年在 MenACWY 疫苗接种决策中的推理、参与和投入。无论是接受还是拒绝 MenACWY 疫苗接种的家庭都是如此。青少年在 MenACWY 疫苗接种决策方面的参与要么是短暂的,要么是不存在的。然而,这一时刻为青少年提供了参与疫苗接种和决策的机会,父母是促进这一点的关键人物。