The Wilderness Institute, Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana; Human Dimensions Lab, Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana; Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana.
Flathead Lake Biological Station, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Polson, Montana.
Wilderness Environ Med. 2021 Sep;32(3):332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
Human activity in wilderness areas has the potential to affect aquatic ecosystems, including through the introduction of microorganisms associated with fecal contamination. We examined fecal microorganism contamination in water sources (lake outlets, snowmelt streams) in the popular Absaroka Beartooth Wilderness in the United States. Although the region is remote, increasing human visitation has the potential to negatively affect water quality, with particular concern about human-derived microorganism fecal contaminants.
We used standard fecal indicator bacterial assays that quantified total coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli concentrations, together with more specific polymerase chain reaction-based microbial assays that identified possible human sources of fecal microorganisms in these waters.
Total coliforms were detected at all lake outlets (21 of 21 sites), and E coli was detected at 11 of 21 sites. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assays revealed the presence of human feces-derived microorganisms, albeit at abundances below the limit of detection (<10 gene copies per milliliter of water) at all but 1 of the sampling sites.
Our results suggest low prevalence of water-borne pathogens (specifically E coli and human-derived Bacteroides) in this popular wilderness area. However, widespread detection of total coliforms, Bacteroides, and E coli highlight the importance of purifying water sources in wilderness areas before consumption. Specific sources of total coliforms and E coli in these waters remain unknown but could derive from wild or domesticated animals that inhabit or visit the Absaroka Beartooth Wilderness. Hence, although contamination by human fecal microorganisms appears minimal, human visitation could indirectly influence fecal contamination through domesticated animals.
人类在荒野地区的活动有可能影响水生生态系统,包括通过引入与粪便污染有关的微生物。我们在美国颇受欢迎的阿萨巴罗卡-比尔特霍特荒野地区,检测了水源(湖泊出口、融雪溪流)中的粪便微生物污染情况。尽管该地区偏远,但游客人数的增加有可能对水质产生负面影响,特别是对人类来源的微生物粪便污染物的关注。
我们使用标准粪便指示细菌检测法,定量检测总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的浓度,同时使用更具体的聚合酶链反应微生物检测法,确定这些水中可能的人类粪便微生物来源。
所有湖泊出口处都检测到总大肠菌群(21 个地点中的 21 个),而在 21 个地点中的 11 个地点检测到大肠杆菌。液滴数字聚合酶链反应检测法显示,尽管在所有采样点中,除了 1 个采样点外,其他采样点的水中人类粪便微生物的丰度都低于检测限(<10 个基因拷贝/毫升的水),但仍存在人类粪便微生物。
我们的研究结果表明,在这个受欢迎的荒野地区,水源中存在的水传播病原体(特别是大肠杆菌和人类来源的拟杆菌)的流行率较低。然而,总大肠菌群、拟杆菌和大肠杆菌的广泛检测突出了在荒野地区饮用前净化水源的重要性。这些水中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的具体来源尚不清楚,但可能来自栖息或访问阿萨巴罗卡-比尔特霍特荒野地区的野生动物或家畜。因此,尽管人类粪便微生物的污染似乎很少,但人类的访问可能会通过家畜间接影响粪便污染。