Department of Neurology, University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Oct 1;42(9):e1318-e1326. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003252.
Previous studies in phobic postural vertigo patients showed characteristic frequency changes in body sway fluctuations, raising the question whether similar spectral changes can be also observed in the recently defined syndrome of persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD).
Cross-sectional prospective study.
Tertiary referral center.
Sixty-one PPPD patients and 41 healthy controls.
Static balance was assessed while standing on firm surface with eyes open or closed (conditions 1 and 2) and while standing on foam with eyes open or closed (conditions 3 and 4). Postural sway was analyzed by means of time (sway area and standard deviation) and frequency domain metrics. The latter was based on comparisons of the percentage of energy in each of three frequency bands: low (0-0.5 Hz), middle (0.05-2 Hz), and high frequency (2-20 Hz).
Stabilometric time and frequency domain parameters.
Time domain metrics deteriorated significantly from conditions 1 through condition 4 in patients and controls. Spectral changes, however, were more abundant in PPPD subjects than in controls. Patients showed increased low frequency, but decreased high frequency spectral power in condition 3 as compared to condition 2. Dizziness Handicap Inventory score was positively correlated with middle frequency and negatively correlated with low frequency fluctuations.
We conclude that PPPD patients exhibit a time domain sway pattern in different conditions which is grossly similar to that of controls. However, sensory feedback conditions with equal sway area show unique differences in their spectral content in PPPD patients. Moreover, perceived severity of dizziness is associated with greater body oscillations in the middle frequency band.
先前在恐高症姿势性眩晕患者中的研究显示,身体摆动波动存在特征性的频率变化,这引发了一个问题,即在最近定义的持续性姿势感知性头晕(PPPD)综合征中是否也可以观察到类似的频谱变化。
横断面前瞻性研究。
三级转诊中心。
61 例 PPPD 患者和 41 名健康对照者。
在睁眼或闭眼站立于坚实表面(条件 1 和 2)和睁眼或闭眼站立于泡沫垫上(条件 3 和 4)时,评估静态平衡。通过时间(摆动面积和标准差)和频域指标分析姿势摆动。后者基于比较三个频带中每个频带的能量百分比:低频(0-0.5 Hz)、中频(0.05-2 Hz)和高频(2-20 Hz)。
静态平衡的时间和频域参数。
患者和对照组的时间域指标从条件 1 到条件 4 均显著恶化。然而,与对照组相比,PPPD 患者的频谱变化更为丰富。与条件 2 相比,患者在条件 3 中表现出低频增加,但高频谱功率降低。头晕残疾量表评分与中频呈正相关,与低频波动呈负相关。
我们得出结论,PPPD 患者在不同条件下表现出与对照组相似的时间域摆动模式。然而,在具有相等摆动面积的感觉反馈条件下,PPPD 患者的频谱内容存在独特差异。此外,头晕的严重程度与中频的身体摆动幅度更大相关。