• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内血栓切除术治疗院内卒中的工作流程和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Workflow and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for In-Hospital Stroke a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Radiology and Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.

Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Radiology and Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105937. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105937. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105937
PMID:34174516
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute strokes due to large vessel occlusion in hospitalized patients is not uncommon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the timing and outcome of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for in-hospital stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of clinical studies published in English until September 2020 in the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting original data on the characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital stroke patients treated with EVT were included. We extracted data on the time-metrics from last known well (LKW) until reperfusion was achieved. We also collected data on procedural and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 5093 retrieved studies, 8 were included (2,622 patients). The median age was 71.4 years and median NIHSS score on admission was 16. Patients were mostly admitted to the cardiology service (27.3%). The pooled time from LKW to recognition by staff was 72.9 min (95% CI: 40.7 to 105 min). 25.6% received IV tPA. The mean time from stroke recognition to arterial puncture was 134.5 min (95% CI: 94.9 to 174.1). Successful reperfusion occurred in 82.8.% with a pooled mean time from detection to reperfusion of 193.1 min (95% CI: 139.5 to 246.7). The 90-day independent functional outcome was reported in 42% of patients (95% CI 29 to 55%).

CONCLUSION

EVT can be performed safely and successfully for in-hospital strokes. Noticeable delays from LKW to detection and then to puncture are noted. This calls for better stroke pathways to identify and treat these patients.

BACKGROUND

Stroke in hospitalized patients, referred to as in-hospital stroke (IHS), accounts for 2.2-17% of all strokes. The majority of these are ischemic while intracranial hemorrhage represents 2-11% of all IHS. These patients are expected to have a rapid diagnosis and treatment given the ongoing medical supervision, and therefore favorable outcomes. However, existing studies report poor outcomes in patients with IHS with a mortality risk that exceeds that of community-onset stroke (COS): 24.7% vs 9.6%. Surviving IHS patients are also less likely to be discharged home compared to COS (27.7% vs 49.9%) and to be functionally independent at 3 months (31.0% vs 50.4%)..

摘要

背景与目的

在住院患者中,由于大血管闭塞引起的急性脑卒中并不少见。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究血管内血栓切除术(EVT)治疗住院卒中的时机和结果。

方法

我们对截至 2020 年 9 月在 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 数据库中发表的英文临床研究进行了荟萃分析。纳入了报告接受 EVT 治疗的住院卒中患者特征和结局的原始数据的研究。我们从最后一次明确(LKW)到再灌注成功的时间指标中提取数据。我们还收集了手术和功能结局的数据。

结果

在 5093 项检索研究中,有 8 项符合纳入标准(2622 例患者)。中位年龄为 71.4 岁,入院时 NIHSS 评分为 16。患者主要被收入心内科(27.3%)。从 LKW 到工作人员识别的中位时间为 72.9 分钟(95%CI:40.7 至 105 分钟)。25.6%接受了 IV tPA。从卒中识别到动脉穿刺的平均时间为 134.5 分钟(95%CI:94.9 至 174.1 分钟)。成功再灌注的比例为 82.8%,从检测到再灌注的平均时间为 193.1 分钟(95%CI:139.5 至 246.7 分钟)。90 天独立功能结局的报告率为 42%(95%CI:29%至 55%)。

结论

EVT 可安全有效地用于治疗住院脑卒中。从 LKW 到检测再到穿刺,存在明显的延迟。这需要更好的脑卒中通路来识别和治疗这些患者。

背景

住院患者脑卒中(IHS)又称住院期间脑卒中,占所有脑卒中的 2.2-17%。这些患者大多数为缺血性脑卒中,而颅内出血占所有 IHS 的 2-11%。由于这些患者正在接受医疗监护,因此应尽快做出诊断和治疗,以获得良好的预后。然而,现有研究报告称,IHS 患者的结局较差,死亡率超过社区发病脑卒中(COS):24.7%比 9.6%。与 COS 相比,存活的 IHS 患者出院回家的可能性更低(27.7%比 49.9%),3 个月时功能独立的可能性也更低(31.0%比 50.4%)。

相似文献

1
Workflow and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for In-Hospital Stroke a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内血栓切除术治疗院内卒中的工作流程和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105937. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105937. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Thrombectomy after in-house stroke in the transfer population.转诊人群中院内卒中后的血栓切除术
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105049. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105049. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Comparison between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy.血管内血栓切除术治疗住院卒中和社区发病卒中的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0214883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214883. eCollection 2019.
4
Bridging versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Pooled Meta-Analysis for Time of Intervention, Eligibility, and Study Design.桥接与直接机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较:基于干预时间、入选标准和研究设计的亚组汇总荟萃分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(2):223-232. doi: 10.1159/000507844. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Endovascular Thrombectomy VS. Medical Treatment for Mild Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗轻度中风患者的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105258. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105258. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Impact of endovascular reperfusion on low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score large-vessel occlusion stroke.血管内再灌注对低国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的大血管闭塞性卒中的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jul;29(7):104836. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104836. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke Due to Carotid Occlusion: A Series of 153 Consecutive Patients.颈动脉闭塞所致急性卒中的机械取栓术:153例连续病例系列研究
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;46(3-4):132-141. doi: 10.1159/000492866. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Chronic Kidney Disease and Outcome Following Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.慢性肾脏病与急性缺血性脑卒中血管内取栓术后结局。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104665. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104665. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
9
Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment on Thrombectomy Outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) Randomized, Controlled Trial.小核心梗死灶和近端闭塞性缺血性卒中血管内治疗(ESCAPE)随机对照试验中血栓切除术结果的工作流程及治疗时间分析
Circulation. 2016 Jun 7;133(23):2279-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019983. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Outcomes after Thrombectomy in Belfast: Mothership and Drip-and-Ship in the Real World.贝尔法斯特取栓术后的结果:现实世界中的母船和滴注-转运。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;47(5-6):231-237. doi: 10.1159/000500849. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of endovascular treatment for in-hospital stroke vs. community-onset stroke: a propensity score-matched analysis.血管内治疗对院内卒中和社区发病卒中的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2684-2693. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12232-4. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
Mechanical Thrombectomy for In-Hospital Onset Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.院内发病卒中的机械取栓术:一项比较性系统评价与荟萃分析
J Stroke. 2024 Jan;26(1):41-53. doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.01613. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
A single-site retrospective review of in-hospital stroke.
单站点回顾性住院脑卒中研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;193(3):1471-1478. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03579-0. Epub 2023 Nov 30.