Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Clinical Research, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Oct-Dec;39(4):484-488. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the compliance of rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (RAST) and conventional laboratory procedures.
The RAST was performed directly from the blood cultures of 71 Gram negative bacilli (GNB) and 38 Gram positive cocci (GPC) isolates. The results were evaluated at fourth, sixth and eighth hour. Categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), major error (ME) and minor error (mE) were calculated and compared with the results of conventional Vitek-2 system.
Categorical agreement was detected ≥90 in cefotaxime and meropenem at fourth hour in Escherichia coli isolates. An encourage positive CA results were obtained from meropenem, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin at the fourth hour in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. CA was compatible in imipenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa at sixth hour. CA was low (<90%) in piperacillin-tazobactam for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and meropenem in P. aeruginosa isolates. A good CA (≥90) with all tested antibiotics were found at all hours for Acinetobacter baumannii and also very high CA (100%) was detected at sixth and eighth hour in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. CA remained below the standard criteria at fourth hour in vancomycin and high level gentamicin, in addition to imipenem at sixth hours in enterococci isolates. VME and ME were not detected and mE was 12.7% in GNB and 50% in GPC at eighth hour.
EUCAST RAST at eighth hour will be beneficial in urgent patients due to their high CA rate, easy preparation, inexpensive, and could be performed with the available equipment and personnel.
本研究旨在评估快速抗生素药敏试验(RAST)和常规实验室程序的符合率。
直接从 71 株革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)和 38 株革兰氏阳性球菌(GPC)分离株的血培养物中进行 RAST。结果在第 4、6 和 8 小时进行评估。计算并比较了类别一致性(CA)、重大误差(ME)、次要误差(mE)和非常大的次要误差(VME),与常规 Vitek-2 系统的结果进行比较。
第 4 小时时,头孢噻肟和美罗培南对大肠埃希菌的 CA 达到≥90%。在肺炎克雷伯菌中,第 4 小时时,美罗培南、头孢他啶和环丙沙星的 CA 结果为阳性。在第 6 小时时,亚胺培南、环丙沙星、庆大霉素和妥布霉素对铜绿假单胞菌的 CA 一致。哌拉西林他唑巴坦对大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的 CA 较低(<90%),美罗培南对铜绿假单胞菌的 CA 也较低。所有测试的抗生素在第 8 小时时对鲍曼不动杆菌的 CA 均较高(≥90%),在第 6 和第 8 小时时对金黄色葡萄球菌的 CA 也非常高(100%)。在第 4 小时时,万古霉素和高水平庆大霉素以及第 6 小时时的亚胺培南的 CA 不符合标准,肠球菌的 CA 为 12.7%。在第 8 小时时,GNB 的 mE 为 12.7%,GPC 的 mE 为 50%,未检测到 VME 和 ME。
由于 CA 率高、准备简单、成本低廉,并且可以使用现有设备和人员进行,因此在紧急情况下,EUCAST RAST 在第 8 小时将是有益的。