• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项随机对照临床试验,旨在对卵泡刺激素 delta 进行个体化剂量方案进行临床验证,以用于亚洲体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射患者的卵巢刺激。

A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients.

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2021 Aug 18;36(9):2452-2462. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab155.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deab155
PMID:34179971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373472/
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Is ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen at least as efficacious as follitropin alfa in a conventional dosing regimen in Asian population?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Ovarian stimulation with individualised follitropin delta dosing resulted in a non-inferior ongoing pregnancy rate, a significantly higher live birth rate and a significantly lower incidence of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous randomised controlled trials conducted in Japan as well as in Europe, North- and South America have demonstrated that ovarian stimulation with the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and body weight modulated the ovarian response and reduced the risk of OHSS without compromising pregnancy and live birth rates.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre, assessor-blind trial conducted in 1009 Asian patients from mainland China, South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Randomisation was stratified by age (<35, 35-37, 38-40 years). The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10-11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority limit -10.0%; analysis adjusted for age stratum).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The follitropin delta treatment consisted of a fixed daily dose individualised according to each patient's initial AMH level and body weight (AMH <15 pmol/l: 12 μg; AMH ≥15 pmol/l: 0.19 to 0.10 μg/kg; min-max 6-12 μg). The follitropin alfa dose was 150 IU/day for the first 5 days with subsequent potential dose adjustments according to individual response. A GnRH antagonist protocol was applied. OHSS was classified based on Golan's system. Women with an ongoing pregnancy were followed until live birth and 4 weeks after.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly (P < 0.001) lower with individualised follitropin delta versus conventional follitropin alfa (10.0 ± 6.1 versus 12.4 ± 7.3). Nevertheless, compared to the conventional dosing approach, the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen resulted in on average 2 more oocytes (9.6 ± 5.3 versus 7.6 ± 3.5) in potential low responders as indicated by AMH <15 pmol/l, and on average 3 fewer oocytes (10.1 ± 6.3 versus 13.8 ± 7.5) in potential high responders as indicated by AMH ≥15 pmol/l. Among women with AMH ≥15 pmol/l, excessive response occurred less frequently with individualised follitropin delta than with follitropin alfa (≥15 oocytes: 20.2% versus 39.1%; ≥20 oocytes: 6.7% versus 18.5%; both P < 0.001). The incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS was significantly (P = 0.004) reduced from 9.6% with follitropin alfa to 5.0% with individualised follitropin delta. The total gonadotropin use was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced from an average of 109.9 ± 32.9 μg (1498 ± 448 IU) follitropin alfa to 77.5 ± 24.4 μg follitropin delta. Non-inferiority of follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen to conventional follitropin alfa was established with respect to the primary endpoint of ongoing pregnancy rate which was 31.3% with follitropin delta compared to 25.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 5.4% [95% CI: -0.2%; 11.0%]). The live birth rate was significantly higher at 31.3% with individualised follitropin delta compared to 24.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 6.4% [95% CI: 0.9%; 11.9%]; P = 0.023). The live birth rate for each stratum were as follows for follitropin delta and follitropin alfa, respectively; <35 years: 31.0% versus 25.0%, 35-37 years: 35.3% versus 26.7%, 38-40 years: 20.0% versus 14.3%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The trial only covered the clinical outcome of one treatment cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The present trial shows that in addition to reducing the early OHSS risk, follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen has the potential to improve the success rate in fresh cycles across all ages and with a lower gonadotropin consumption compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.Q., Y.Z., X.L., T.H., H.-Y.H. and S.-H.K. have received institutional (not personal) clinical trial fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. M.G., B.M. and J.-C.A. are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.-C.A. has pending and issued patent applications in the WO 2013/020996 and WO 2019/043143 patent families that comprise allowed and granted patent rights related to follitropin delta.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03296527 (clinicaltrials.gov).

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

28 September 2017.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 1 December 2017.

摘要

研究问题

在亚洲人群中,与传统剂量方案相比,使用固定剂量的个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 是否至少与卵泡刺激素 α 一样有效?

总结答案

与传统的卵泡刺激素 α 剂量方案相比,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 给药方案导致持续妊娠率无差异,但活产率显著提高,早期卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)和/或预防干预的发生率显著降低。

已知情况

以前在日本以及欧洲、北美和南美进行的随机对照试验表明,基于血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平和体重的个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 给药方案调节了卵巢反应,降低了 OHSS 的风险,而不影响妊娠和活产率。

研究设计、大小、持续时间:在中国内地、韩国、越南和中国台湾的 1009 名接受首次体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期的亚洲患者中进行了一项随机、对照、多中心、评估者盲法试验。随机分组按年龄(<35 岁、35-37 岁、38-40 岁)分层。主要终点是新鲜周期中胚胎移植后 10-11 周的持续妊娠率(非劣效性下限-10.0%;分析调整了年龄分层)。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:卵泡刺激素 δ 治疗包括根据每位患者的初始 AMH 水平和体重个体化的固定日剂量(AMH<15 pmol/l:12μg;AMH≥15 pmol/l:0.19 至 0.10μg/kg;最小-最大 6-12μg)。卵泡刺激素 α 的剂量为 150IU/天,前 5 天,随后根据个体反应进行潜在剂量调整。应用 GnRH 拮抗剂方案。根据 Golan 系统对 OHSS 进行分类。有持续妊娠的妇女一直随访至活产和 4 周后。

主要结果和机会的作用

与传统的卵泡刺激素 α 相比,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 导致的获卵数显著减少(P<0.001)(10.0±6.1 与 12.4±7.3)。尽管如此,与传统的给药方法相比,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 给药方案平均使潜在的低反应者(AMH<15 pmol/l)多获得 2 个卵母细胞(9.6±5.3 与 7.6±3.5),使潜在的高反应者(AMH≥15 pmol/l)少获得 3 个卵母细胞(10.1±6.3 与 13.8±7.5)。在 AMH≥15 pmol/l 的女性中,与卵泡刺激素 α 相比,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 较少发生过度反应(≥15 个卵母细胞:20.2% 与 39.1%;≥20 个卵母细胞:6.7% 与 18.5%;均 P<0.001)。早期 OHSS 和/或早期 OHSS 的预防干预发生率也显著降低(P=0.004),从卵泡刺激素 α 的 9.6%降至个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 的 5.0%。总的促性腺激素使用量也显著减少(P<0.001),从平均 109.9±32.9μg(1498±448IU)卵泡刺激素 α 降至 77.5±24.4μg 卵泡刺激素 δ。个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 在其固定剂量方案中的非劣效性已在主要终点持续妊娠率方面得到证实,与卵泡刺激素 α 相比,其持续妊娠率为 31.3%,而卵泡刺激素 α 为 25.7%(估计平均差异 5.4%[-0.2%;11.0%])。与卵泡刺激素 α 相比,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 的活产率显著更高,为 31.3%,而卵泡刺激素 α 为 24.7%(估计平均差异 6.4%[95%CI:0.9%;11.9%];P=0.023)。卵泡刺激素 δ 和卵泡刺激素 α 的每个亚组的活产率如下:<35 岁:31.0%与 25.0%,35-37 岁:35.3%与 26.7%,38-40 岁:20.0%与 14.3%。

局限性、谨慎的原因:该试验仅涵盖新鲜卵裂期胚胎移植一个治疗周期的临床结局。

更广泛的研究结果意义

本研究表明,除了降低早期 OHSS 风险外,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 固定剂量方案还具有改善所有年龄段新鲜周期成功率的潜力,与传统的卵泡刺激素 α 剂量方案相比,还可降低促性腺激素的消耗。

研究基金/利益冲突:本研究由 Ferring 制药公司资助。J.Q.、Y.Z.、X.L.、T.H.、H.-Y.H.和 S.-H.K. 从 Ferring 制药公司获得了机构(非个人)临床试验费用。M.G.、B.M.和 J.-C.A. 是 Ferring 制药公司的员工。J.-C.A. 拥有涉及卵泡刺激素 δ 的 WO 2013/020996 和 WO 2019/043143 专利家族的已授权和已授予的专利申请,这些专利申请包含与卵泡刺激素 δ 相关的允许和授予的专利权利。

试验注册编号

NCT03296527(clinicaltrials.gov)。

试验注册日期

2017 年 9 月 28 日。

首例患者入组日期

2017 年 12 月 1 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/1cd224cd7144/deab155f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/6d2c75bd6d2a/deab155f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/55e23041edc2/deab155f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/336cd9cb59f8/deab155f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/1cd224cd7144/deab155f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/6d2c75bd6d2a/deab155f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/55e23041edc2/deab155f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/336cd9cb59f8/deab155f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8241/8373472/1cd224cd7144/deab155f4.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients.一项随机对照临床试验,旨在对卵泡刺激素 delta 进行个体化剂量方案进行临床验证,以用于亚洲体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射患者的卵巢刺激。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Aug 18;36(9):2452-2462. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab155.
2
BEYOND: a randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of individualized follitropin delta dosing in a GnRH agonist versus antagonist protocol during the first ovarian stimulation cycle.超越:一项随机对照试验,比较在第一个卵巢刺激周期中,促卵泡素δ个体化给药在 GnRH 激动剂与拮抗剂方案中的疗效和安全性。
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 9;39(7):1481-94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae092.
3
A randomized, controlled, first-in-patient trial of choriogonadotropin beta added to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol.一项在 GnRH 激动剂长方案中进行卵巢刺激的妇女中添加绒促性素β与卵泡刺激素δ的随机、对照、首例患者试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 30;37(6):1161-1174. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac061.
4
Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection.中国女性接受体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射时,个体化卵泡刺激素 δ 剂量治疗后的临床结局比较。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Oct 4;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y.
5
Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.重组人促卵泡激素α/重组人促黄体生成素α在辅助生殖技术中的疗效与安全性:一项针对卵巢反应不良患者的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):544-555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew360.
6
Pretreatment with luteal estradiol for programming antagonist cycles compared to no pretreatment in advanced age women stimulated with corifollitropin alfa: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.黄体雌激素预处理在高龄妇女接受促卵泡素阿尔法刺激的拮抗剂周期中与无预处理相比:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Sep 1;39(9):1979-1986. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae167.
7
Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 2: The predicted hyper responder.个体化与标准 FSH 剂量在 IVF/ICSI 起始女性中的应用:一项 RCT。第 2 部分:预测的高反应者。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 1;32(12):2506-2514. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex319.
8
Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial.个体化与传统卵巢刺激用于体外受精:一项多中心、随机、对照、评估者盲法的3期非劣效性试验。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):387-396.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.Corifollitropin alfa 序贯高纯度 HMG 与重组 FSH 在年轻卵巢低反应患者中的应用:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2225-2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex296.
10
Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).采用卵巢储备标志物对接受体外受精加胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)的女性进行个体化促性腺激素剂量选择。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD012693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012693.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes between flexible antagonist protocol and long luteal phase protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function: a prospective cohort study.正常卵巢储备功能患者中灵活拮抗剂方案与黄体期长方案的临床结局比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;16:1526895. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1526895. eCollection 2025.
2
The Type of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Medication Given for In Vitro Fertilization Impacts Oocyte Retrieval: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于体外受精的促卵泡激素药物类型对卵母细胞采集的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Oct;118(4):790-802. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70014. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
3
Ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta for in vitro fertilization: a multicentre, randomized, assessor-blind comparison with follitropin alfa using conventional dosing regimens (ADAPT-1 trial).
使用δ-促卵泡素进行体外受精的卵巢刺激:一项多中心、随机、评估者盲法比较,采用传统给药方案与α-促卵泡素进行对比(ADAPT-1试验)
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf119.
4
Evaluation of Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes Using Crossover Administration of Two Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormones in the Same Patients.在同一患者中交叉使用两种重组促卵泡激素对辅助生殖技术结局的评估。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85312. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85312. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Pilot Trial to Individualize the Dose of Follitropin Delta in Oocyte Donors: REKO15.在卵母细胞捐赠者中个体化确定注射用重组促卵泡素δ剂量的预试验:REKO15
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 11;14(12):4150. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124150.
6
Ovarian Responses and Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization Following Progesterone-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Protocols Using Follitropin Delta.使用卵泡刺激素δ进行孕激素预处理卵巢刺激和促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案后的体外受精的卵巢反应和结局
Cureus. 2025 Jun 4;17(6):e85341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85341. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
FSH receptor N680S genotype-guided gonadotropin choice increases cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates after fertilization.促卵泡激素受体N680S基因型指导下的促性腺激素选择可提高受精后的累积妊娠率和活产率。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 13;16:1576090. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1576090. eCollection 2025.
8
The influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the development of gonadotrophins and ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technologies.制药行业对辅助生殖技术中促性腺激素及卵巢刺激方案发展的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 4;16:1536844. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1536844. eCollection 2025.
9
Letrozole Cotreatment Reduces Unexpectedly Poor Responses in Ovarian Stimulation With Follitropin Delta: A Strategy to Prevent High Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) but Poor Response.来曲唑联合治疗可减少使用Delta促卵泡素进行卵巢刺激时意外出现的低反应:一种预防抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平高但反应差的策略。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78513. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78513. eCollection 2025 Feb.
10
Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with follitropin delta results in higher cumulative live birth rates compared with follitropin alfa/beta in a large retrospectively analyzed real-world data set.在一项大型回顾性分析的真实世界数据集中,与α/β促卵泡素相比,使用δ促卵泡素进行控制性卵巢刺激(COS)可带来更高的累积活产率。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Feb 20;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01364-5.