Suppr超能文献

机器人全胰切除术:综述。

Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Narrative Review.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan;

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):1907-1911. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12456.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Studies on robotic total pancreatectomy (RTP) have been limited regardless of the increasing evidence on robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of this study was to review the current status of RTP in terms of surgical techniques and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search using PubMed was conducted to investigate surgical techniques and outcomes of RTP.

RESULTS

A total of eight case series with 56 patients were included. The indications for RTP consisted of benign or pre-malignant tumors in 43 patients and malignant tumors in 13 patients. Surgical techniques included the "dividing technique" and "en-bloc technique". Regarding surgical outcomes, the rate of conversion to open total pancreatectomy was 3.6% and the incidence of major complications was 10.7%.

CONCLUSION

Although evidence for RTP is still lacking, RTP is feasible for selected patients when performed in specialized centers. Further studies are essential to investigate the effectiveness of RTP compared to open total pancreatectomy.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管机器人胰十二指肠切除术的证据越来越多,但机器人全胰切除术(RTP)的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在回顾 RTP 在手术技术和结果方面的现状。

材料和方法

使用 PubMed 进行文献检索,以调查 RTP 的手术技术和结果。

结果

共纳入 8 项病例系列研究,共 56 例患者。RTP 的适应证包括 43 例良性或恶性前肿瘤和 13 例恶性肿瘤。手术技术包括“分割技术”和“整块技术”。关于手术结果,中转开腹全胰切除术的发生率为 3.6%,主要并发症的发生率为 10.7%。

结论

尽管 RTP 的证据仍然不足,但在专业中心进行时,RTP 对选定的患者是可行的。需要进一步的研究来调查 RTP 与开腹全胰切除术相比的有效性。

相似文献

1
Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Narrative Review.
In Vivo. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):1907-1911. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12456.
2
Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Novel Pancreatic Head-First Approach (with Video).
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1649-1650. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04922-5. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
3
Robotic versus open total pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1259-1270. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01569-z. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
[Evidence for robotics in oncological pancreatic surgery].
Chirurg. 2021 Feb;92(2):102-106. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01299-0.
5
Robotic versus open total pancreatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2325-2332. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02202-z. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials.
J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01289-2. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a comprehensive review.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Aug;6(3):158-64. doi: 10.1111/ases.12040. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
[A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases].
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Feb 20;38(2):130-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.02.02.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive versus open total pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2058-2069. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000392.
2
Robotic versus open total pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1259-1270. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01569-z. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Novel Pancreatic Head-First Approach (with Video).
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1649-1650. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04922-5. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3).
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e886-e895. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
3
Robotic-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Dec;9(6):759-770. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2020.03.19.
4
Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e355-e363. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003628.
5
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590.
7
Fully robotic total pancreatectomy: technical aspects and outcomes.
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0818-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Robotic total pancreatectomy with splenectomy: technique and outcomes.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3691-3696. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-6003-1. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):336-342. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4753.
10
Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study.
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1425-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验