Suppr超能文献

我们应该缝合关节镜切口吗?对关节内液体潴留的影响。

Should We Suture Arthroscopic Portals? Effects on Intra-articular Fluid Retention.

作者信息

Sargin Serdar, Atik Aziz, Aslan Ahmet

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Turkey.

Departmant of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(2):167-172. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731350. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Abstract

Knee arthroscopy is one of the most common surgical procedures in orthopaedics and especially in sports medicine. Portal problems and effusion after knee arthroscopy have been reported. The fluid retention within the joint in knee arthroscopy can affect clinical outcomes, but there is no consensus on portal management. The studies of portal management in knee arthroscopy have mainly addressed wound healing and cosmetic problems. There is insufficient information in the literature about whether the irrigation fluid used in this effusion contributes to the process. This study investigates whether arthroscopic irrigation fluid is retained in the joint and whether portal-closure management has an effect on effusion. In this randomized, prospective study, 91 patients (46 [50.5%] sutured-portal group and 45 [49.5%] open-portal group) were included. Suprapatellar knee-diameter measurement and the number of times the dressing was changed were used to assess intra-articular fluid collection. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Society score were used to evaluate knee problems. All portal wounds in both groups healed without any problems. Superficial or deep infection was not observed in either group. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score, Oxford knee scores, and Knee Society scores between groups. Although there was a decrease in the knee diameter of both groups between the early postoperative period and first postoperative day, a statistically significant difference in knee diameter was found, especially in the open-portal group. There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of the number of dressings used in the first 24 hours after surgery. Leaving portals open may be effective in preventing intra-articular fluid retention. We thus advise leaving the arthroscopy portals open with just a simple dressing for selected patients.

摘要

膝关节镜检查是骨科尤其是运动医学中最常见的外科手术之一。膝关节镜检查后的切口问题和积液已有报道。膝关节镜检查时关节内的液体潴留会影响临床结果,但在切口管理方面尚无共识。膝关节镜检查中切口管理的研究主要关注伤口愈合和美观问题。关于这种积液中使用的冲洗液是否会促进该过程,文献中信息不足。本研究调查关节镜冲洗液是否会潴留于关节内,以及切口闭合管理对积液是否有影响。在这项随机、前瞻性研究中,纳入了91例患者(46例[50.5%]为缝合切口组,45例[49.5%]为开放切口组)。通过测量髌上膝关节直径和更换敷料的次数来评估关节内积液情况。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、牛津膝关节评分和膝关节协会评分来评估膝关节问题。两组的所有切口均顺利愈合,未出现任何问题。两组均未观察到浅表或深部感染。两组之间的VAS评分、牛津膝关节评分和膝关节协会评分无统计学显著差异。虽然术后早期与术后第一天两组的膝关节直径均有所减小,但在膝关节直径方面发现了统计学显著差异,尤其是在开放切口组。两组在术后24小时内使用的敷料数量方面存在显著差异。开放切口可能对预防关节内液体潴留有效。因此,我们建议对部分患者仅采用简单敷料,保持关节镜切口开放。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验