Suppr超能文献

与种系检测相比,肿瘤检测在检测上皮性卵巢癌患者BRCA1和BRCA2突变中的可靠性

Reliability of Tumor Testing Compared to Germline Testing for Detecting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

作者信息

Bekos Christine, Grimm Christoph, Kranawetter Marlene, Polterauer Stephan, Oberndorfer Felicitas, Tan Yen, Müllauer Leonhard, Singer Christian F

机构信息

Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 24;11(7):593. doi: 10.3390/jpm11070593.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

BRCA 1/2 mutation status has become one of the most important parameters for treatment decision in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of this study was to compare tumor DNA with blood DNA sequencing to evaluate the reliability of BRCA tumor testing results.

METHODS

Patients who were treated for EOC between 2003 and 2019 at the Medical University of Vienna and underwent both germline (gBRCA) and tumor (tBRCA) testing for BRCA mutations were identified. We calculated the concordance rate and further analyzed discordant cases.

RESULTS

Out of 140 patients with EOC, gBRCA mutation was found in 47 (33.6%) and tBRCA mutation in 53 (37.9%) patients. Tumor testing identified an additional 9/140 (6.4%) patients with somatic BRCA mutation and negative germline testing. The comparison of germline testing with tumor testing revealed a concordance rate of 93.5% and a negative predictive value of tumor testing of 96.0%. After BRCA variants of uncertain significance were included in the analysis, concordance rate decreased to 90.9%.

CONCLUSION

Tumor testing identified the majority of pathogenic germline BRCA mutations but missed three (2.1%) patients. In contrast, nine (6.4%) patients harboring a somatic BRCA mutation would have been missed by gBRCA testing only.

摘要

背景

BRCA 1/2突变状态已成为上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者治疗决策的最重要参数之一。本研究的目的是比较肿瘤DNA与血液DNA测序,以评估BRCA肿瘤检测结果的可靠性。

方法

确定2003年至2019年在维也纳医科大学接受EOC治疗并接受BRCA突变的种系(gBRCA)和肿瘤(tBRCA)检测的患者。我们计算了一致性率,并进一步分析了不一致的病例。

结果

在140例EOC患者中,47例(33.6%)发现gBRCA突变,53例(37.9%)发现tBRCA突变。肿瘤检测还发现另外9/140例(6.4%)患者存在体细胞BRCA突变且种系检测为阴性。种系检测与肿瘤检测的比较显示一致性率为93.5%,肿瘤检测的阴性预测值为96.0%。将意义不明确的BRCA变异纳入分析后,一致性率降至90.9%。

结论

肿瘤检测识别出了大多数致病性种系BRCA突变,但遗漏了3例(2.1%)患者。相比之下,仅进行gBRCA检测会遗漏9例(6.4%)携带体细胞BRCA突变的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86bc/8305542/8c1864b29019/jpm-11-00593-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Germline and Somatic Mutations in 172 Chinese Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;10:295. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00295. eCollection 2020.
3
Feasibility of tumor testing for BRCA status in high-grade serous ovarian cancer using fresh-frozen tissue based approach.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;158(3):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.479. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
5
Simultaneous germline and somatic sequencing in ovarian carcinoma: mutation rate and impact on clinical decision-making.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):517-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
8
immunohistochemistry for screening of mutation in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2020 May 27;33:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100582. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Japanese nationwide observational multicenter study of tumor BRCA1/2 variant testing in advanced ovarian cancer.
Cancer Sci. 2023 Jan;114(1):271-280. doi: 10.1111/cas.15518. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
BRCA genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: how do we meet our patients' needs?
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;10(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00686-8.
5
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Providing Evidence of Predisposition Genes.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138113.
7
A commentary on the discrepancy between blood and tumour BRCA testing: An open question.
BJOG. 2022 Aug;129(9):1422-1426. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17158. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Molecular Pathology of Cancer: The Past, the Present, and the Future.
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):676. doi: 10.3390/jpm11070676.

本文引用的文献

1
pathogenic variants in triple-negative luminal-like breast cancers: genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of 531 patients.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Dec 16;12:1758835920975326. doi: 10.1177/1758835920975326. eCollection 2020.
5
Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1222-1245. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02960. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
Simultaneous germline and somatic sequencing in ovarian carcinoma: mutation rate and impact on clinical decision-making.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):517-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
8
Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2495-2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810858. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
9
Guidance Statement On BRCA1/2 Tumor Testing in Ovarian Cancer Patients.
Semin Oncol. 2017 Jun;44(3):187-197. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
An evaluation of the challenges to developing tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing methodologies for clinical practice.
Hum Mutat. 2018 Mar;39(3):394-405. doi: 10.1002/humu.23375. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验