Suppr超能文献

用于HIV相关神经认知障碍的国际HIV痴呆量表:系统评价与荟萃分析

International HIV Dementia Scale for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Rosca Elena Cecilia, Tadger Philippe, Cornea Amalia, Tudor Raluca, Oancea Cristian, Simu Mihaela

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Department of Neurology, Clinical Emergency County Hospital Timisoara, 300736 Timisoara, Romania.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 20;11(6):1124. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061124.

Abstract

The present study aims to systematically review the evidence on the accuracy of the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) test for diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and outline the quality and quantity of research evidence available on the accuracy of IHDS in people living with HIV. We conducted a systematic literature review, searching five databases from inception until July 2020. We extracted dichotomized positive and negative test results at various thresholds and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of IHDS. Quality assessment was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Fifteen cross-sectional studies, published between 2011 and 2018, met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Overall, 3760 patients were included, but most studies recruited small samples. We assessed most studies as being applicable to the review question, though we had concerns about the selection of participants in three studies. The accuracy of IHDS was investigated at thirteen cut-off points (scores 6-12). The threshold of 10 is the most useful for optimal HAND screening (including asymptomatic neurocognitive disorder, symptomatic HAND, and HIV-associated dementia) with fair diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

本研究旨在系统评价国际HIV痴呆量表(IHDS)检测在诊断人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)相关神经认知障碍(HAND)方面准确性的证据,并概述现有关于IHDS在HIV感染者中准确性的研究证据的质量和数量。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,检索了从起始到2020年7月的五个数据库。我们提取了不同阈值下的二分法阳性和阴性检测结果,并计算了IHDS的敏感性和特异性。根据诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADAS-2)标准进行质量评估。2011年至2018年发表的15项横断面研究符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。总体而言,纳入了3760例患者,但大多数研究招募的样本量较小。尽管我们对三项研究中的参与者选择存在担忧,但我们评估大多数研究适用于该综述问题。在13个切点(分数6 - 12)处研究了IHDS的准确性。阈值为10对于最佳HAND筛查(包括无症状神经认知障碍、有症状HAND和HIV相关痴呆)最有用,诊断准确性尚可。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验