Dua Rajvir, Ma Yongqian, Newton Paul K
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1191, USA.
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1191, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 9;13(12):2880. doi: 10.3390/cancers13122880.
We investigate the robustness of adaptive chemotherapy schedules over repeated cycles and a wide range of tumor sizes. Using a non-stationary stochastic three-component fitness-dependent Moran process model (to track frequencies), we quantify the variance of the response to treatment associated with multidrug adaptive schedules that are designed to mitigate chemotherapeutic resistance in an idealized (well-mixed) setting. The finite cell ( tumor cells) stochastic process consists of populations of chemosensitive cells, chemoresistant cells to drug 1, and chemoresistant cells to drug 2, and the drug interactions can be synergistic, additive, or antagonistic. Tumor growth rates in this model are proportional to the average fitness of the tumor as measured by the three populations of cancer cells compared to a background microenvironment average value. An adaptive chemoschedule is determined by using the N→∞ limit of the finite-cell process (i.e., the adjusted replicator equations) which is constructed by finding closed treatment response loops (which we call evolutionary cycles) in the three component phase-space. The schedules that give rise to these cycles are designed to manage chemoresistance by avoiding competitive release of the resistant cell populations. To address the question of how these cycles perform in practice over large patient populations with tumors across a range of sizes, we consider the variances associated with the approximate stochastic cycles for finite , repeating the idealized adaptive schedule over multiple periods. For finite cell populations, the distributions remain approximately multi-Gaussian in the principal component coordinates through the first three cycles, with variances increasing exponentially with each cycle. As the number of cycles increases, the multi-Gaussian nature of the distribution breaks down due to the fact that one of the three sub-populations typically saturates the tumor (competitive release) resulting in treatment failure. This suggests that to design an effective and repeatable adaptive chemoschedule in practice will require a highly accurate tumor model and accurate measurements of the sub-population frequencies or the errors will quickly (exponentially) degrade its effectiveness, particularly when the drug interactions are synergistic. Possible ways to extend the efficacy of the stochastic cycles in light of the computational simulations are discussed.
我们研究了在重复周期和广泛肿瘤大小范围内自适应化疗方案的稳健性。使用非平稳随机三组分适应度依赖的莫兰过程模型(来跟踪频率),我们量化了与多药自适应方案相关的治疗反应方差,这些方案旨在在理想化(充分混合)环境中减轻化疗耐药性。有限细胞(肿瘤细胞)随机过程由化学敏感细胞群体、对药物1耐药的细胞群体和对药物2耐药的细胞群体组成,药物相互作用可以是协同、相加或拮抗的。该模型中的肿瘤生长速率与肿瘤的平均适应度成正比,肿瘤的平均适应度通过与背景微环境平均值相比的三个癌细胞群体来衡量。自适应化疗方案通过使用有限细胞过程的(N→∞)极限(即调整后的复制方程)来确定,该极限是通过在三维相空间中找到封闭的治疗反应循环(我们称之为进化循环)构建的。产生这些循环的方案旨在通过避免耐药细胞群体的竞争性释放来管理化疗耐药性。为了解决这些循环在实际中对于大量不同大小肿瘤患者群体的表现问题,我们考虑了与有限近似随机循环相关的方差,在多个周期内重复理想化的自适应方案。对于有限细胞群体,在前三个周期中,分布在主成分坐标中仍近似为多高斯分布,方差随每个周期呈指数增长。随着周期数增加,分布的多高斯性质会瓦解,因为三个亚群体中的一个通常会使肿瘤饱和(竞争性释放),导致治疗失败。这表明,要在实际中设计出有效且可重复的自适应化疗方案,将需要一个高度精确的肿瘤模型以及对亚群体频率的精确测量,否则误差将迅速(呈指数级)降低其有效性,特别是当药物相互作用是协同作用时。根据计算模拟讨论了扩展随机循环疗效的可能方法。