Department of Transplant Surgery, Kidney Disease Center, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Adult Nephrology, National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Quezon City, Philippines.
Clin Transplant. 2021 Oct;35(10):e14415. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14415. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the efficacy and safety of an everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) versus mycophenolic acid with standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI) regimen in Asian patients from the TRANSFORM study. METHODS: In this 24-month, open-label study, de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, along with induction therapy and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Of the 2037 patients randomized in the TRANSFORM study, 293 were Asian (EVR+rCNI, N = 136; MPA+sCNI, N = 157). At month 24, EVR+rCNI was noninferior to MPA+sCNI for the binary endpoint of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 ml/min/1.73 m or treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.0% vs. 29.2%, P = .011 for a noninferiority margin of 10%). Graft loss and death were reported for one patient each in both arms. Mean eGFR was higher in EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI (72.2 vs. 66.3 ml/min/1.73 m , P = .0414) even after adjusting for donor type and donor age (64.3 vs. 59.3 ml/min/1.73 m , P = .0582). Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable. BK virus (4.4% vs. 12.1%) and cytomegalovirus (4.4% vs. 13.4%) infections were significantly lower in the EVR+rCNI arm. CONCLUSION: This subgroup analysis in Asian de novo KTxRs demonstrated that the EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI regimen provides comparable antirejection efficacy, better renal function, and reduced viral infections (NCT01950819).
目的:我们分析了依维莫司联合低剂量钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(EVR+rCNI)与吗替麦考酚酯联合标准剂量钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(MPA+sCNI)方案在 TRANSFORM 研究中亚洲患者中的疗效和安全性。
方法:在这项为期 24 个月、开放标签的研究中,初治肾移植受者(KTxR)按 1:1 比例随机分配至 EVR+rCNI 或 MPA+sCNI 组,同时接受诱导治疗和皮质类固醇治疗。
结果:在 TRANSFORM 研究的 2037 例随机患者中,有 293 例为亚洲人(EVR+rCNI,N=136;MPA+sCNI,N=157)。在 24 个月时,EVR+rCNI 在估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<50ml/min/1.73m 或治疗后证实的急性排斥反应的二项终点方面不劣于 MPA+sCNI(27.0%比 29.2%,非劣效性边界为 10%,P=0.011)。两组各有 1 例患者报告发生移植物丢失和死亡。EVR+rCNI 组的平均 eGFR 高于 MPA+sCNI 组(72.2ml/min/1.73m 比 66.3ml/min/1.73m,P=0.0414),即使在校正供体类型和供体年龄后(64.3ml/min/1.73m 比 59.3ml/min/1.73m,P=0.0582)。总体不良事件发生率相当。EVR+rCNI 组的 BK 病毒(4.4%比 12.1%)和巨细胞病毒(4.4%比 13.4%)感染明显更低。
结论:在亚洲初治肾移植受者的亚组分析中,EVR+rCNI 与 MPA+sCNI 方案在提供相当的抗排斥反应疗效、更好的肾功能和降低病毒感染方面具有优势(NCT01950819)。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018-5-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-8
Am J Transplant. 2019-2
BMC Nephrol. 2019-1-9
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018-5-11