Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):116.e1-116.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.093. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Births in freestanding birth centers have more than doubled between 2007 and 2019. Although birthing centers, which are defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as ". . . freestanding facilities that are not hospitals," are being promoted as offering women fewer interventions than hospitals, there are limited recent data available on neonatal outcomes in these settings.
To compare several important measures of neonatal safety between 2 United States birth settings and birth attendants: deliveries in freestanding birth centers and hospital deliveries by midwives and physicians.
This is a retrospective cohort study using the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, and Division of Vital Statistics natality online database for the years 2016 to 2019. All term, singleton, low-risk births were eligible for inclusion. The study outcomes were several neonatal outcomes including neonatal death, neonatal seizures, 5-minute Apgar scores of <4 and <7, and neonatal death in nulliparous and in multiparous women. Outcomes were compared between the following 3 groups: births in freestanding birth centers, in-hospital births by a physician, and in-hospital births by a midwife. The prevalence of each neonatal outcome among the different groups was compared using Pearson chi-squared test, with the in-hospital midwife births being the reference group. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to account for several potential confounding factors such as maternal prepregnancy body mass index, maternal weight gain, parity, gestational weeks, and neonatal birthweight and calculated as adjusted odds ratio.
The study population consisted of 9,894,978 births; 8,689,467 births (87.82%) were in-hospital births by MDs and DOs, 1,131,398 (11.43%) were in-hospital births by midwives, and 74,113 (0.75%) were births in freestanding birth centers. Freestanding birth center deliveries were less likely to be to non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, less likely to women with public insurance, less likely to be women with their first pregnancy, and more likely to be women with advanced education and to have pregnancies at ≥40 weeks' gestation. Births in freestanding birth center had a 4-fold increase in neonatal deaths (3.64 vs 0.95 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 4.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.62-6.1), a more than 7-fold increase in neonatal deaths for nulliparous patients (6.8 vs 0.92 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 4.42-13.76), a more than 2-fold increase in neonatal seizures (3.91 vs 1.94 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.22), and a more than 7-fold increase of a 5-minute Apgar score of <4 (194.84 vs 28.5 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 7-7.95). Compared with hospital midwife deliveries, hospital physician deliveries had significantly higher adverse neonatal outcomes (P<0.001).
Births in United States freestanding birth centers are associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes such as neonatal deaths, seizures, and low 5-minute Apgar scores. Therefore, when counseling women about the location of birth, it should be conveyed that births in freestanding birth centers are not among the safest birth settings for neonates compared with hospital births attended by either midwives or physicians.
2007 年至 2019 年,独立分娩中心的分娩量增加了一倍多。尽管生育中心被美国妇产科医师学会定义为“……独立的医疗机构,而不是医院”,并被宣传为比医院提供的干预措施更少,但最近关于这些环境中新生儿结局的数据有限。
比较美国两个分娩地点和分娩助手的几项重要新生儿安全指标:独立分娩中心的分娩和由助产士和医生在医院的分娩。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了美国卫生与公众服务部、疾病控制与预防中心、国家卫生统计中心和人口统计司生育在线数据库,时间范围为 2016 年至 2019 年。所有足月、单胎、低危产妇均符合纳入标准。研究结果包括新生儿死亡、新生儿癫痫发作、5 分钟 Apgar 评分<4 和<7,以及初产妇和经产妇的新生儿死亡。将研究结果与以下 3 组进行比较:独立分娩中心分娩、医院由医生分娩和医院由助产士分娩。使用 Pearson 卡方检验比较不同组别的新生儿结局发生率,以医院助产士分娩为参考组。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来解释母体孕前体重指数、体重增加、产次、孕周、新生儿出生体重等多种潜在混杂因素,并计算调整后的比值比。
研究人群包括 9894978 例分娩;8689467 例(87.82%)为 MD 和 DO 医院分娩,1131398 例(11.43%)为医院助产士分娩,74113 例(0.75%)为独立分娩中心分娩。独立分娩中心分娩的产妇更不可能是非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔,更不可能有公共保险,更不可能是第一次怀孕,更有可能接受过高等教育,且怀孕时间更长,超过 40 周。独立分娩中心分娩的新生儿死亡风险增加了 4 倍(每 10000 例活产中有 3.64 例死亡,而每 10000 例活产中有 0.95 例死亡:调整后的比值比,4.00;95%置信区间,2.62-6.1),初产妇的新生儿死亡风险增加了 7 倍以上(每 10000 例活产中有 6.8 例死亡,而每 10000 例活产中有 0.92 例死亡:调整后的比值比,7.7;95%置信区间,4.42-13.76),新生儿癫痫发作的风险增加了两倍以上(每 10000 例活产中有 3.91 例死亡,而每 10000 例活产中有 1.94 例死亡:调整后的比值比,2.19;95%置信区间,1.48-3.22),5 分钟 Apgar 评分<4 的风险增加了 7 倍以上(每 10000 例活产中有 194.84 例死亡,而每 10000 例活产中有 28.5 例死亡:调整后的比值比,7.46;95%置信区间,7-7.95)。与医院助产士分娩相比,医院医生分娩的新生儿不良结局发生率显著更高(P<0.001)。
美国独立分娩中心的分娩与新生儿不良结局的风险增加有关,如新生儿死亡、癫痫发作和 5 分钟 Apgar 评分较低。因此,在向妇女提供分娩地点咨询时,应传达的信息是,与由助产士或医生在医院分娩相比,独立分娩中心的分娩并不是新生儿最安全的分娩环境之一。