Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):119.e1-119.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.091. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
The risk of venous thromboembolism after delivery is modified by mode of delivery, with the risk of venous thromboembolism being higher after cesarean delivery than vaginal delivery. The risk of venous thromboembolism after peripartum hysterectomy is largely unknown.
This study aimed to compare the incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism among women who had and did not have a peripartum hysterectomy. Furthermore, we sought to compare the risk of venous thromboembolism after hysterectomy with other patient, pregnancy, and delivery risk factors known to be associated with venous thromboembolism.
This was a cross-sectional study of women with delivery encounters identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from October 2015 to December 2017. Delivery encounters and all variables of interest were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes. The incidence of venous thromboembolism during delivery and rehospitalizations within 6 weeks after discharge was compared among women who had and did not have a peripartum hysterectomy. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate associations between venous thromboembolism and hysterectomy, adjusted for the following characteristics: maternal age, payer at time of delivery, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, multifetal gestation, peripartum infection, and peripartum hemorrhage. Similarly, venous thromboembolism risk was compared by mode of delivery, including hysterectomy. Diagnoses that may have been indications for peripartum hysterectomy were identified among patients who underwent a hysterectomy and compared between those who did and did not have venous thromboembolism. Analyses used survey weights to obtain population estimates.
Of the 4,419,037 women with deliveries, 5098 (11.5 per 10,000 deliveries) underwent a hysterectomy. Moreover, 110 patients (215.8 per 10,000 deliveries) were diagnosed with venous thromboembolism after hysterectomy. The risk of venous thromboembolism was significantly higher in women who underwent a hysterectomy than in women who did not have a hysterectomy (unadjusted odds ratio, 25.1 [95% confidence interval, 20.0-31.5]; adjusted odds ratio, 11.2 [95% confidence interval, 8.7-14.5]; P<.001). Comparing the risk of venous thromboembolism by mode of delivery, the unadjusted and adjusted incidences of venous thromboembolism were 6.9 (95% confidence interval, 6.5-7.3) and 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 6.9-7.8) per 10,000 deliveries among women after vaginal delivery without peripartum hysterectomy, 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 11.8-13.1) and 11.3 (95% confidence interval, 10.7-12.0) per 10,000 deliveries after cesarean delivery without hysterectomy; and 217.2 (95% confidence interval, 169.1-265.2) and 96.9 (95% confidence interval 76.9-126.5) per 10,000 deliveries after hysterectomy, regardless of mode of delivery. Of the 110 diagnoses of venous thromboembolism with peripartum hysterectomy, 89 (81%) occurred during delivery admission. Of the remaining 21 cases, 50% occurred within the first 10 days after discharge from delivery, and 75% occurred within 25 days after discharge.
These findings have demonstrated that peripartum hysterectomy is associated with a markedly increased risk of venous thromboembolism in the postpartum period, even when controlling for other known risk factors for postpartum thromboembolic events. Here, the incidence of venous thromboembolism after peripartum hysterectomy (2.2%) met some guideline-based risk thresholds for routine thromboprophylaxis, potentially for at least 2 weeks after delivery. Further investigation into the role of routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during and after delivery is needed.
分娩后静脉血栓栓塞的风险因分娩方式而异,剖宫产的风险高于阴道分娩。产后子宫切除术后静脉血栓栓塞的风险很大程度上是未知的。
本研究旨在比较有和没有产后子宫切除术的妇女静脉血栓栓塞的发生率和风险。此外,我们还比较了子宫切除术与其他已知与静脉血栓栓塞相关的患者、妊娠和分娩风险因素的静脉血栓栓塞风险。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年 10 月至 2017 年 12 月期间全国再入院数据库中分娩的女性。使用国际疾病分类,第 10 次修订版诊断和手术代码识别分娩事件和所有感兴趣的变量。比较有和没有产后子宫切除术的妇女在分娩期间和出院后 6 周内静脉血栓栓塞的发生率。使用多变量逻辑回归估计静脉血栓栓塞与子宫切除术之间的关联,调整了以下特征:产妇年龄、分娩时的支付者、肥胖、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟、多胎妊娠、围产期感染和围产期出血。同样,比较了包括子宫切除术在内的不同分娩方式的静脉血栓栓塞风险。在接受子宫切除术的患者中确定了可能是产后子宫切除术指征的诊断,并在发生静脉血栓栓塞和未发生静脉血栓栓塞的患者之间进行了比较。分析使用调查权重获得人口估计。
在 4419037 名分娩的女性中,5098 名(每 10000 次分娩中有 11.5 次)接受了子宫切除术。此外,110 例患者(每 10000 次分娩中有 215.8 例)在子宫切除术后被诊断为静脉血栓栓塞。与未行子宫切除术的妇女相比,行子宫切除术的妇女静脉血栓栓塞的风险明显更高(未调整的优势比,25.1 [95%置信区间,20.0-31.5];调整后的优势比,11.2 [95%置信区间,8.7-14.5];P<.001)。比较不同分娩方式的静脉血栓栓塞风险,阴道分娩且无产后子宫切除术的妇女静脉血栓栓塞的未调整和调整发生率分别为 6.9(95%置信区间,6.5-7.3)和 7.4(95%置信区间,6.9-7.8)/10000 次分娩,剖宫产且无子宫切除术的妇女静脉血栓栓塞的未调整和调整发生率分别为 12.5(95%置信区间,11.8-13.1)和 11.3(95%置信区间,10.7-12.0)/10000 次分娩,而无论分娩方式如何,子宫切除术后的未调整和调整发生率分别为 217.2(95%置信区间,169.1-265.2)和 96.9(95%置信区间,76.9-126.5)/10000 次分娩。在 110 例产后子宫切除术合并静脉血栓栓塞的诊断中,89 例(81%)发生在分娩住院期间。其余 21 例中,50%发生在分娩出院后 10 天内,75%发生在分娩出院后 25 天内。
这些发现表明,产后子宫切除术与产后静脉血栓栓塞风险显著增加相关,即使在控制其他已知产后血栓栓塞事件的风险因素后也是如此。在这里,产后子宫切除术(2.2%)后静脉血栓栓塞的发生率达到了一些基于指南的常规预防血栓栓塞的风险阈值,至少在分娩后 2 周内需要进行常规预防血栓栓塞。需要进一步研究分娩期间和之后常规静脉血栓栓塞预防的作用。