New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Mar;39(3):270-273. doi: 10.1177/10499091211025733. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
This study investigated patient outcomes of care before and after transitioning to a surgical intensivist-led trauma-intensive care unit (ICU) team. The intensivist team provided daily multidisciplinary rounds and continuity of care. Prior to an intensivist model, general surgeons cared for trauma patients admitted to the unit.
Outcomes of 1,078 trauma patients, admitted to the ICU at a Level II trauma center, under care of general surgeons (1/2011-8/2012, n = 449) were retrospectively compared with care managed by a surgical intensivist team (1/2013-5/2015, n = 629) by Pearson Chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests. A multivariable logistic regression technique was used to control for covariates. Demographics and injury severity were analyzed. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), ventilator-free and ICU-free days, and ICU readmission rate. Other data collected included palliative care consultation. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ICU mortality (P = 0.055), hospital LOS (P = 0.481), ventilator-free days (P = 0.174), or ICU readmission rate (P = 0.587). The surgical intensivist team consulted palliative care more frequently (4.0% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001), while managing more trauma patients who were older than 65 years (P < 0.001) with lower Glasgow Coma Scale (P = 0.048) and higher injury severity (P = 0.025) and abbreviated injury scale (P < 0.001) scores.
There were no differences in outcomes. However, incorporating palliative care consultation in the ICU is essential in the support of critically ill patients and their families. These data demonstrate that a surgical intensivist team utilized palliative care more often in the management of trauma patients admitted to the ICU.
本研究调查了在过渡到由外科重症监护医生领导的创伤重症监护病房(ICU)团队后,患者的护理结果。重症监护医生团队提供了日常多学科查房和护理连续性。在重症监护医生模式之前,普通外科医生负责照顾入住该病房的创伤患者。
回顾性比较了在二级创伤中心 ICU 接受普通外科医生(2011 年 1 月至 2012 年 8 月,n=449)和外科重症监护医生团队(2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 5 月,n=629)治疗的 1078 例创伤患者的 ICU 死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、无呼吸机和 ICU 天数以及 ICU 再入院率。采用多变量逻辑回归技术控制协变量。分析人口统计学和损伤严重程度。主要结果是 ICU 死亡率。次要结果是 LOS、无呼吸机和 ICU 天数以及 ICU 再入院率。收集的其他数据包括姑息治疗咨询。结果:两组 ICU 死亡率(P=0.055)、医院 LOS(P=0.481)、无呼吸机天数(P=0.174)或 ICU 再入院率(P=0.587)均无统计学差异。重症监护医生团队更频繁地咨询姑息治疗(4.0% vs. 13.5%,P<0.001),同时管理更多年龄大于 65 岁(P<0.001)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较低(P=0.048)、损伤严重程度和简明损伤评分较高(P=0.025 和 P<0.001)的创伤患者。
两组患者的结果无差异。然而,在 ICU 中引入姑息治疗咨询对于支持重症患者及其家属至关重要。这些数据表明,外科重症监护医生团队在管理入住 ICU 的创伤患者时更经常使用姑息治疗。