Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;127(19):3640-3650. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33667. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Multiple studies have indicated that place of residence can influence cancer survival; however, few studies have specifically focused on geographic factors and outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate evidence for geographic disparities in cancer diagnosis stage and overall survival in AYAs and to examine whether stage mediated survival associations.
National Cancer Database data on AYAs aged 15 to 39 years who were diagnosed with cancer from 2010 to 2014 were obtained. Residence in Metropolitan (metro), urban, or rural counties at the time of diagnosis was defined using Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Distance between the patient's residence and the reporting hospital was classified as short (≤2.5 miles), intermediate (>12.5 to <50 miles), or long (≥50 miles). Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analyses.
The stage and survival analyses included 146,418 and 178,688 AYAs, respectively. The odds of a late versus early stage at diagnosis (stages III and IV vs I and II) were 1.16 (95% CI, 1.05-1.29) times greater for AYAs living in rural versus metro counties and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.16-1.25) times greater for AYAs living at long versus short distances to the reporting hospital. The hazard of death was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.05-1.31) and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.25-1.36) times greater for those living in rural versus metro counties, respectively, and for long versus short distances to the reporting hospital, respectively. Disease stage mediated 54% and 31% of the associations between metro, urban, or rural residence and residential distance categories and survival.
Rural residence and living long distances from the reporting hospital were associated with later stage diagnoses and lower survival in AYAs with cancer. Further research is needed to understand mechanisms.
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable population because cancer is of low suspicion in this population and may not be diagnosed in a timely manner. The authors evaluated evidence for geographic disparities in cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in the AYA population. The findings indicate that AYAs living in rural versus metropolitan US counties and those living farther from the diagnosis reporting hospital are more likely to be diagnosed at a later cancer stage, when it is generally less treatable, and have lower survival compared with AYAs living in metropolitan counties.
多项研究表明,居住地可能会影响癌症的生存情况;然而,很少有研究专门关注癌症青少年和年轻成年人(AYA)的地理因素和结果。本研究的目的是评估 AYA 癌症诊断时的阶段和总体生存率方面的地理差异证据,并检验疾病分期是否会影响生存关联。
本研究从 2010 年至 2014 年期间,获取了全国癌症数据库中年龄在 15 至 39 岁之间、被诊断患有癌症的 AYA 数据。诊断时居住地位于大都市(metro)、城市或农村县的患者被定义为使用农村-城市连续体代码。患者居住地与报告医院之间的距离分为短距离(≤2.5 英里)、中距离(>12.5 至 <50 英里)或长距离(≥50 英里)。使用逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险回归模型进行分析。
分期和生存分析分别纳入了 146418 名和 178688 名 AYA。与大都市县的 AYA 相比,居住在农村县的 AYA 被诊断为晚期(III 期和 IV 期)的可能性高出 1.16 倍(95%CI,1.05-1.29),与短距离报告医院相比,居住在长距离报告医院的 AYA 被诊断为晚期的可能性高出 1.20 倍(95%CI,1.16-1.25)。与大都市县的 AYA 相比,居住在农村县的 AYA 死亡的风险分别高出 1.17 倍(95%CI,1.05-1.31)和 1.30 倍(95%CI,1.25-1.36),与短距离报告医院相比,居住在长距离报告医院的 AYA 死亡的风险分别高出 1.30 倍(95%CI,1.25-1.36)。疾病分期分别解释了大都市、城市或农村居住和居住距离类别与生存之间 54%和 31%的关联。
农村居住和远离报告医院与 AYA 癌症患者的晚期诊断和较低的生存率相关。需要进一步研究以了解其机制。
本研究评估了 AYA 癌症患者在诊断时的阶段和生存率方面的地理差异证据。结果表明,与大都市县的 AYA 相比,居住在农村县和远离诊断报告医院的 AYA 更有可能被诊断为晚期癌症,此时癌症通常更难治疗,且与居住在大都市县的 AYA 相比,生存机会更低。