Suppr超能文献

靶向 UVB 与准分子光光疗治疗白癜风的疗效比较

Is targeted UVB as effective as excimer light phototherapy in treatment of vitiligo?

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMC), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh, India.

Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy, CUTIS Institute of Dermatology, Srinagar, India.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2021 Sep;34(5):e15058. doi: 10.1111/dth.15058. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

Abstract

Excimer light (EL) and targeted UVB (TUVB) devices have been used successfully in repigmenting vitiligo. To compare the repigmenting efficacy and safety of EL with TUVB device in vitiligo. The study was conducted retrospectively on patients of vitiligo who had received either EL (Group A) or TUVB (Group B) from year 2015 to 2020. Data pertaining to 40 such age and sex matched patients from each group was retrieved with almost similar sites of involvement. Only patients whose phototherapy sessions had been given twice weekly for minimum of 30 sessions or until 90%-100% repigmentation were included in the study. The study was retrospective in nature and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki were followed during the study. The primary endpoint compared between the two groups was the extent of repigmentation achieved on different sites of body and adverse effects from treatment. Secondary endpoints compared included total number of doses, cumulative dose needed for complete repigmentation and number of doses needed for onset of repigmentation. There were 82.6% responders in Group A and 76.3% in Group B who had achieved at least 50% repigmentation. Excellent response (75%-100% repigmentation) was achieved in 68.1% lesions in Group A and 46.4% lesions in Group B. Patients in Group A needed less number of doses (13.75 vs. 19.37) and less cumulative dose (6.14 vs. 7.69 J/cm ) to achieve complete or near complete repigmentation. Adverse effects were negligible in both groups. Targeted phototherapy with EL demonstrated better repigmenting efficacy than TUVB in vitiligo.

摘要

准分子光 (EL) 和靶向 UVB (TUVB) 设备已成功用于白癜风的复色。为比较 EL 与 TUVB 设备在白癜风复色中的疗效和安全性。本研究回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2020 年间接受 EL(A 组)或 TUVB(B 组)治疗的白癜风患者。从每组中检索了几乎相同受累部位的 40 例年龄和性别匹配的患者数据。仅纳入接受每周两次、至少 30 次、或直至 90%-100%复色的光疗的患者。本研究为回顾性研究,研究过程中遵循了《赫尔辛基宣言》中概述的原则。两组之间的主要终点是比较不同身体部位的复色程度和治疗的不良反应。比较的次要终点包括总剂量、完全复色所需的累积剂量和复色开始所需的剂量数。A 组 82.6%的患者和 B 组 76.3%的患者达到了至少 50%的复色。A 组 68.1%的病变和 B 组 46.4%的病变达到了极好的反应(75%-100%复色)。A 组患者需要更少的剂量(13.75 与 19.37)和更少的累积剂量(6.14 与 7.69 J/cm )来实现完全或近乎完全复色。两组的不良反应均可以忽略不计。靶向 EL 光疗在白癜风中的复色效果优于 TUVB。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验