Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, School of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department, Mexico; Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social, Delegación Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.
Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social, Delegación Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico; Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, School of Medicine, Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit México), Mexico.
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Nov;23(11):1639-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
The optimal management of localized gallbladder perforation (Neimeier type II) has yet to be defined. The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors associated with improved patient outcomes.
Systematic review of studies that described the management of Neimeier type II perforation, reported complications of the first intervention, necessity of added interventions, resolution of the pathology, and days of hospital stay were included. The search strategy was conducted in EMBASE, Mayo Journals, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science (December 2020) RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (53% male) from case reports, series, and cohorts were included for analysis. In total 56 (46%) and 44 (36%)patients were treated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy respectively. Overall risk of bias was moderate. The need for another intervention was higher in the laparoscopic group (5 vs 17, p=<0.001) as well as prevalence of complications (4 vs 16, p=<0.001), but lower for days of hospital stay (median days 5. vs 15, p = 0.008) against open cholecystectomy. Preoperative percutaneous catheter drainage did not influence outcome.
Open cholecystectomy has a lower need for further surgical procedures and postoperative complications, but a longer hospital stay. These outcomes did not vary with preoperative percutaneous drainage. The effect of timing of cholecystectomy did not influence the outcomes.
局部胆囊穿孔(Neimeier II 型)的最佳治疗方法尚未确定。本系统评价的目的是确定与改善患者预后相关的因素。
系统检索描述 Neimeier II 型穿孔治疗的研究,纳入报告首次干预并发症、需要额外干预、病理缓解和住院天数的研究。检索策略在 EMBASE、梅奥杂志、MEDLINE、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science(2020 年 12 月)进行。
共纳入 122 例(53%为男性)来自病例报告、系列和队列的患者进行分析。分别有 56 例(46%)和 44 例(36%)患者接受开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗。总体偏倚风险为中度。腹腔镜组需要进一步干预的风险更高(5 例比 17 例,p<0.001),并发症发生率也更高(4 例比 16 例,p<0.001),但住院天数更短(中位数 5 天比 15 天,p=0.008)。术前经皮导管引流不影响结局。
开腹胆囊切除术进一步手术和术后并发症的需求较低,但住院时间较长。这些结果不因术前经皮引流而改变。胆囊切除术时机的影响对结果没有影响。