Institute of Animal Nutrition, Vetsuisse faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stiftung Wildstation Landshut, Utzenstorf, Switzerland.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2021 Oct;105 Suppl 1:91-96. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13561. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
The supplemental feeding of wildlife is a worldwide phenomenon. The most widespread and socially accepted example is bird feeding. Commercial hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus L.) diets are readily available in Switzerland. To test the hypothesis that commercial hedgehog diets are nutritionally inadequate, the following parameters (as taken from the label) of five commercial diets (three dry and two wet) were compared to the natural diet of E. europaeus: List of feed materials, crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), crude fibre (CF), ether extract (EE) and nitrogen-free extracts (NfE). To test the second hypothesis, that feed labels of commercially available hedgehog diets in Switzerland are in accordance with Swiss and European law, the following parameters were assessed: Type of feed, net quantity, moisture content, instructions for proper use, list of the feed materials and claims. In all dry diets, the first ingredient was cereals (38.8%-50%), whereas in both wet diets, it was meat and meat by-products (51% in one product). Only one product had a CP content comparable to that of the natural diet and four products had a higher NfE content. Overall, the wet products were more comparable to the natural diet, especially regarding CP and NfE content. Of the five examined diets, three were labelled as complete feeds and two as compound feeds. The label analysis revealed inaccuracies and possible misleading information on two products. In conclusion, the use of commercial dry hedgehog diets should be discouraged as they do not resemble the natural diet of E. europaeus and are likely nutritionally inadequate. The commercial wet hedgehog diets should only be used supplementary. The feed labels of commercially available hedgehog diets were not always in compliance with Swiss and European law. The public should be educated about feeding E. europaeus and the risks of commercial diets for wildlife.
野生动物的补充喂养是一种全球性现象。最广泛和被社会接受的例子是鸟类喂养。商业刺猬(Erinaceus europaeus L.)饮食在瑞士随处可见。为了检验商业刺猬饮食在营养上不足的假设,以下五个商业饮食(三个干的和两个湿的)的参数(取自标签)与 E. europaeus 的自然饮食进行了比较:饲料原料清单、粗灰分(CA)、粗蛋白(CP)、粗纤维(CF)、乙醚提取物(EE)和无氮提取物(NfE)。为了检验第二个假设,即瑞士市售刺猬饮食的饲料标签符合瑞士和欧洲法律,评估了以下参数:饲料类型、净含量、水分含量、正确使用说明、饲料原料清单和声明。在所有干饲料中,第一种成分是谷物(38.8%-50%),而在两种湿饲料中,都是肉和肉副产品(一种产品中为 51%)。只有一种产品的 CP 含量与自然饮食相当,四种产品的 NfE 含量较高。总体而言,湿产品与自然饮食更为相似,尤其是在 CP 和 NfE 含量方面。在检查的五种饮食中,有三种被标记为全价饲料,两种为配合饲料。标签分析显示两种产品存在不准确和可能误导信息。总之,应该不鼓励使用商业干刺猬饮食,因为它们与 E. europaeus 的自然饮食不同,并且可能在营养上不足。商业湿刺猬饮食只能作为补充使用。市售刺猬饮食的饲料标签并不总是符合瑞士和欧洲法律。应该教育公众有关喂养 E. europaeus 和商业饮食对野生动物的风险。