Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):1504-1513. doi: 10.1002/pds.5329. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
Pain management principles vary considerably between chronic noncancer, acute and cancer pain. Cancer patients responding to oncological treatment may live with low tumor burden for years. Opioid treatment should reflect that the ratio between benefits and risks in these patients is different from patients with a rapidly progressive disease. Our study investigated the prescription patterns of analgesics in patients who died 6 to 9 years after cancer diagnosis.
A pharmaco-epidemiological study based on the Norwegian Prescription Database and Cancer Registry of Norway. The 1-year periodic prevalence of receiving different analgesics and of persistent opioid use were analyzed. Persistent opioid use was defined as >365 Defined Daily Doses or >9000 mg Oral Morphine Equivalents during 365 days with prescriptions in all quarters of the 365 days period. Data were reported for the first 7 years for patients who lived 8-9 years after cancer diagnosis (N = 1502), while for patients who lived 6-7 years (N = 3817) data was reported for the first 5 years after diagnosis.
Compared to age- and gender adjusted general population, the 1-year periodic prevalence of opioid prescription was doubled the first year after diagnosis and remained raised with approximately 50%. The prevalence of persistent opioid use was threefold of the general population. Approximately 55% of patients with persistent opioid use 4 years after a cancer diagnosis were co-medicated with high doses of benzodiazepines and/or benzodiazepine-related hypnotics.
The findings of increased opioid use raise concerns regarding whether the benefits outweigh risks and side effects in this population.
慢性非癌性疼痛、急性疼痛和癌性疼痛的疼痛管理原则有很大差异。对肿瘤治疗有反应的癌症患者可能在多年时间里肿瘤负担较低。阿片类药物治疗应反映出这些患者的获益与风险比与疾病快速进展的患者不同。本研究调查了癌症诊断后 6-9 年死亡的患者的镇痛药处方模式。
这是一项基于挪威处方数据库和挪威癌症登记处的药物流行病学研究。分析了不同时期接受不同镇痛药和持续使用阿片类药物的 1 年周期流行率。持续使用阿片类药物定义为在 365 天内的所有季度中,处方超过 365 天的 365 定义日剂量或超过 9000 毫克口服吗啡等效物。对于癌症诊断后生存 8-9 年的患者(n=1502),报告了第 1 年的前 7 年的数据,而对于生存 6-7 年的患者(n=3817),报告了第 1 年的前 5 年的数据。
与年龄和性别调整后的一般人群相比,诊断后第一年阿片类药物处方的 1 年周期流行率增加了一倍,并且一直保持在大约 50%的较高水平。持续使用阿片类药物的流行率是一般人群的三倍。大约 55%的癌症诊断后 4 年内持续使用阿片类药物的患者同时服用高剂量的苯二氮䓬类药物和/或苯二氮䓬类相关催眠药。
阿片类药物使用增加的发现引起了人们的关注,即在这一人群中,其获益是否超过风险和副作用。