Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway Building, St Paul's Lane, Bournemouth, Dorset. BH8 8AJ.
Deputy Dean for Research & Professional Practice.
Midwifery. 2021 Nov;102:103077. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103077. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
The Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASI) Care Bundle is designed to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. However, introducing behavioural change requires an understanding of current practice. This study aims to establish midwives practise at the time of birth, and the factors that influence this.
Quantitative research - a national online survey.
Nationwide - United Kingdom (UK). Participants 563 midwives from across the UK.
An online survey of midwives' practice. Midwives were invited to participate through the Supervisor of Midwives network. Consent was sought on the landing page. Data analysis using descriptive and inferential statistics, with sub group analyses were used to explore variations in practice. Measurements Number of midwives using "hands on" the perineum and the influences on midwives' perineal practice at the time of birth.
Most midwives preferred to use "hands on" the perineum at the time of birth (61.4%). "Hands on" practise was significantly associated with where midwives worked (p<0.001), risk factors for OASI (p<0.001), and the approach that they were taught in their midwifery training (p<0.01). Midwives expressed lack of confidence in some areas with a third unsure that they could identify the third degree tear category b (38.2%) or c (34.3%).
There has been a growth in the number of midwives using "hands on" at the time of birth but midwives feel that they require additional training in regards to identifying an OASI. The study should be repeated following the roll out of the OASI care bundle, to identify its impact on midwives' perineal practice.
The study identified that there needs to be an improvement in the recognition of OASI by midwives, and in future repeating the study would identify whether the OASI care bundle has influenced midwives' practice.
产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)护理包旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率。然而,引入行为改变需要了解当前的实践。本研究旨在确定助产士在分娩时的实践,并探讨影响这些实践的因素。
定量研究-全国性在线调查。
英国全国范围内。参与者是来自英国各地的 563 名助产士。
对助产士实践的在线调查。通过助产士主管网络邀请助产士参与。在登录页面上征求同意。使用描述性和推断性统计数据进行数据分析,并进行亚组分析以探讨实践中的差异。测量使用“手在”会阴的助产士数量以及在分娩时影响助产士会阴实践的因素。
大多数助产士在分娩时更喜欢“手在”会阴(61.4%)。“手在”实践与助产士工作的地点(p<0.001)、OASI 的风险因素(p<0.001)以及他们在助产士培训中接受的方法(p<0.01)显著相关。助产士在某些领域缺乏信心,三分之一的人不确定他们是否能够识别三度撕裂 b 类(38.2%)或 c 类(34.3%)。
使用“手在”会阴的助产士人数有所增加,但助产士认为他们需要在识别 OASI 方面接受额外的培训。在推出 OASI 护理包后,应重复该研究以确定其对助产士会阴实践的影响。
该研究表明,助产士需要提高对 OASI 的认识,在未来重复该研究将确定 OASI 护理包是否影响了助产士的实践。