Nicholson Jamie A, Clement Nick D, Clelland Andrew D, MacDonald Deborah J, Simpson A Hamish R W, Robinson C Mike
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Jul;2(7):522-529. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0049.R1.
It is unclear whether acute plate fixation facilitates earlier return of normal shoulder function following a displaced mid-shaft clavicular fracture compared with nonoperative management when union occurs. The primary aim of this study was to establish whether acute plate fixation was associated with a greater return of normal shoulder function when compared with nonoperative management in patients who unite their fractures. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there were identifiable predictors associated with return of normal shoulder function in patients who achieve union with nonoperative management.
Patient data from a randomized controlled trial were used to compare acute plate fixation with nonoperative management of united fractures. Return of shoulder function was based on the age- and sex-matched Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores for the cohort. Independent predictors of an early recovery of normal shoulder function were investigated using a separate prospective series of consecutive nonoperative displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures recruited over a two-year period (aged ≥ 16 years). Patient demographics and functional recovery were assessed over the six months post-injury using a standardized protocol.
Data from the randomized controlled trial consisted of 86 patients who underwent operative fixation compared with 76 patients that united with nonoperative treatment. The recovery of normal shoulder function, as defined by a DASH score within the predicted 95% confidence interval for each respective patient, was similar between each group at six weeks (operative 26.7% vs nonoperative 25.0%, p = 0.800), three months (52.3% vs 44.2%, p = 0.768), and six months post-injury (86.0% vs 90.8%, p = 0.349). The mean DASH score and return to work were also comparable at each timepoint. In the prospective cohort, 86.5% (n = 173/200) achieved union by six months post-injury (follow-up rate 88.5%, n = 200/226). Regression analysis found that no specific patient, injury, or fracture predictor was associated with an early return of function at six or 12 weeks.
Return of normal shoulder function was comparable between acute plate fixation and nonoperative management when union was achieved. One in two patients will have recovery of normal shoulder function at three months, increasing to nine out of ten patients at six months following injury when union occurs, irrespective of initial treatment. Cite this article: 2021;2(7):522-529.
与骨折愈合时的非手术治疗相比,目前尚不清楚急性钢板固定是否有助于锁骨中段移位骨折后更早恢复正常肩部功能。本研究的主要目的是确定与骨折愈合的患者非手术治疗相比,急性钢板固定是否与更大程度的正常肩部功能恢复相关。次要目的是调查在非手术治疗实现骨折愈合的患者中,是否存在与正常肩部功能恢复相关的可识别预测因素。
来自一项随机对照试验的患者数据用于比较急性钢板固定与骨折愈合后的非手术治疗。肩部功能恢复基于该队列中年龄和性别匹配的手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。使用一个单独的前瞻性系列研究,该研究为在两年期间招募的连续非手术治疗的锁骨中段移位骨折患者(年龄≥16岁),调查正常肩部功能早期恢复的独立预测因素。使用标准化方案在受伤后六个月内评估患者人口统计学和功能恢复情况。
随机对照试验的数据包括86例接受手术固定的患者和76例非手术治疗实现骨折愈合的患者。根据每个患者预测的95%置信区间内的DASH评分定义的正常肩部功能恢复,在六周时两组相似(手术组26.7%对非手术组25.0%,p = 0.800),三个月时(52.3%对44.2%,p = 0.768),以及受伤后六个月时(86.0%对90.8%,p = 0.349)。每个时间点的平均DASH评分和恢复工作情况也具有可比性。在前瞻性队列中,86.5%(n = 173/200)在受伤后六个月实现骨折愈合(随访率88.5%,n = 200/226)。回归分析发现,在六周或十二周时,没有特定的患者、损伤或骨折预测因素与功能早期恢复相关。
当实现骨折愈合时,急性钢板固定和非手术治疗在正常肩部功能恢复方面具有可比性。无论初始治疗如何,二分之一的患者在三个月时将恢复正常肩部功能,在受伤后六个月骨折愈合时,十分之九的患者将恢复正常肩部功能。引用本文:2021;2(7):522 - 529。