Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Discipline of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Aust Endod J. 2022 Apr;48(1):58-64. doi: 10.1111/aej.12543. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
To compare the cutting efficiency of F6 Sky Taper (F6ST) and One Curve (OC) with different kinematics and cutting inclinations. Cutting efficiency of 80 new F6ST and OC was tested at 90° and 70° inclination in relation to the sample, in continuous rotation and reciprocation, against standardised gypsum samples for 120 seconds using a customised device. Data expressed as weight loss and length of the sample cut were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey t-test (P<.05). F6ST showed significantly higher cutting efficiency in reciprocation, while OC in continuous rotation. Regardless of inclination, F6ST showed statistically higher values than OC in reciprocation, while OC exhibited higher cutting ability in continuous rotation. The 70° inclination significantly improved the cutting efficiency of both files. Reciprocation improved the cutting efficiency of F6ST while continuous rotation enhanced cutting ability of OC. An inclined insertion improved the cutting ability, independently from the movement.
比较 F6 Sky Taper(F6ST)和 One Curve(OC)在不同运动学和切割倾斜角度下的切割效率。在与样本成 90°和 70°的倾斜角度下,使用定制设备,对 80 个新的 F6ST 和 OC 进行持续旋转和往复运动切割标准石膏样本 120 秒,测试其切割效率。使用双向方差分析和 Tukey t 检验(P<.05)分析数据表示为重量损失和样本切割长度。无论倾斜角度如何,F6ST 在往复运动中的切割效率明显更高,而 OC 在连续旋转中更高。无论倾斜角度如何,F6ST 在往复运动中的切割效率都明显高于 OC,而 OC 在连续旋转中的切割能力更高。70°的倾斜角度显著提高了两种锉的切割效率。往复运动提高了 F6ST 的切割效率,而连续旋转则增强了 OC 的切割能力。倾斜插入提高了切割能力,与运动无关。