Suppr超能文献

双胎与单胎宫腔内人工授精(IUI)在不孕夫妇的促排卵周期中的应用比较。

Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 14;7(7):CD003854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003854.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In subfertile couples, couples who have tried to conceive for at least one year, intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) is one of the treatment modalities that can be offered. When IUI is performed a second IUI in the same cycle might add to the chances of conceiving. In a previous update of this review in 2010 it was shown that double IUI increases pregnancy rates when compared to single IUI. Since 2010, different clinical trials have been published with differing conclusions about whether double IUI increases pregnancy rates compared to single IUI.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of double intrauterine insemination (IUI) compared to single IUI in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL in July 2020 and LILACS, Google scholar and Epistemonikos in February 2021, together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled, parallel trials of double versus single IUIs in stimulated cycles in subfertile couples.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified in nine studies involving subfertile women. The evidence was of low quality; the main limitations were unclear risk of bias, inconsistent results for some outcomes and imprecision, due to small trials with imprecise results. We are uncertain whether double IUI improves live birth rate compared to single IUI (odds ratio (OR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.88; I = 29%; studies = 3, participants = 468; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following single IUI is 16%, the chance of live birth following double IUI would be between 12% and 27%. Performing a sensitivity analysis restricted to only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of selection bias showed similar results. We are uncertain whether double IUI reduces miscarriage rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.24; I = 0%; studies = 6, participants = 2363; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of miscarriage following single IUI is 1.5% and the chance following double IUI would be between 1.5% and 5%. The reported clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised may increase with double IUI group (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.86; I = 34%; studies = 9, participants = 2716; low quality evidence). This result should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality of the evidence and the moderate inconsistency. The evidence suggests that the chance of a pregnancy following single IUI is 14% and the chance following double IUI would be between 16% and 23%. We are uncertain whether double IUI affects multiple pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.56; I = 8%; studies = 5; participants = 2203; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of multiple pregnancy following single IUI is 0.7% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.85% and 3.7%. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.28; I = 0%; studies = 4, participants = 1048; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that the chance of an ectopic pregnancy following single IUI is 0.8% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.3% and 3.2%.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our main analysis, of which the evidence is low quality, shows that we are uncertain if double IUI improves live birth and reduces miscarriage compared to single IUI. Our sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of selection bias for both outcomes is consistent with the main analysis. Clinical pregnancy rate may increase in the double IUI group, but this should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality evidence. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on multiple pregnancy rate and ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI.

摘要

背景

在不孕夫妇中,对于尝试怀孕至少一年的夫妇,宫腔内人工授精(IUI)联合卵巢刺激(OH)是一种可提供的治疗方法。当进行第二次 IUI 时,可能会增加受孕的机会。在 2010 年的上一次更新中,研究表明与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 增加了妊娠率。自 2010 年以来,不同的临床试验得出了不同的结论,即与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否增加了妊娠率。

目的

确定在刺激周期中,与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 对不孕夫妇的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

我们于 2020 年 7 月在 Cochrane 妇科和生殖医学(CGF)组试验注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 以及 2021 年 2 月在 LILACS、Google Scholar 和 Epistemonikos 中进行了检索,并通过参考文献检查和与该领域研究人员和专家的联系,确定了其他研究。

选择标准

我们纳入了在不孕夫妇的刺激周期中比较双 IUI 与单次 IUI 的随机对照、平行试验。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立评估了试验质量并提取了数据。我们联系了研究人员以获取更多信息。

主要结果

我们共纳入了 9 项涉及不孕女性的研究。证据质量为低质量;主要局限性为结局的风险偏倚不明确、一些结局的结果不一致以及由于试验规模较小、结果不精确而导致的精度不足。我们不确定与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否能提高活产率(比值比[OR]1.15,95%置信区间[CI]0.71 至 1.88;I²=29%;研究=3,参与者=468;低质量证据)。该证据表明,如果单次 IUI 后活产的机会为 16%,那么双 IUI 后活产的机会将在 12%至 27%之间。进行仅包括低选择偏倚风险的随机对照试验(RCT)的敏感性分析,结果也相似。我们不确定与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否能降低流产率(OR 1.78,95%置信区间[CI]0.98 至 3.24;I²=0%;研究=6,参与者=2363;低质量证据)。该证据表明,单次 IUI 后流产的机会为 1.5%,双 IUI 后流产的机会将在 1.5%至 5%之间。每例随机分配的女性的临床妊娠率可能会随着双 IUI 组的增加而增加(OR 1.51,95%置信区间[CI]1.23 至 1.86;I²=34%;研究=9,参与者=2716;低质量证据)。由于证据质量低且存在中度不一致性,因此应谨慎解释这一结果。该证据表明,单次 IUI 后妊娠的机会为 14%,双 IUI 后妊娠的机会将在 16%至 23%之间。我们不确定与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否会影响多胎妊娠率(OR 2.04,95%置信区间[CI]0.91 至 4.56;I²=8%;研究=5;参与者=2203;低质量证据)。该证据表明,单次 IUI 后多胎妊娠的机会为 0.7%,双 IUI 后多胎妊娠的机会将在 0.85%至 3.7%之间。我们不确定与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否会影响异位妊娠率(OR 1.22,95%置信区间[CI]0.35 至 4.28;I²=0%;研究=4,参与者=1048;低质量证据)。该证据表明,单次 IUI 后异位妊娠的机会为 0.8%,双 IUI 后异位妊娠的机会将在 0.3%至 3.2%之间。

作者结论

我们的主要分析(证据质量低)表明,我们不确定与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否能提高活产率并降低流产率。我们仅对两个结局的低选择偏倚风险的研究进行的敏感性分析与主要分析一致。双 IUI 组的临床妊娠率可能会增加,但由于证据质量低,应谨慎解释这一结果。我们不确定与单次 IUI 相比,双 IUI 是否会影响多胎妊娠率和异位妊娠率。

相似文献

1
Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 14;7(7):CD003854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003854.pub2.
2
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 3;3(3):CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub6.
3
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 14(6):CD011424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011424.pub2.
4
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 19;2:CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub5.
5
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 18;3(3):CD011424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011424.pub3.
6
Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):CD005356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005356.pub3.
7
Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 25;1(1):CD000317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000317.pub4.
8
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 19;2015(11):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub4.
9
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):CD011424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011424.pub4.
10
Endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant for subfertile women in assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 14;8(8):CD013063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013063.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):CD005356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005356.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 3;3(3):CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub6.
2
Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline.
Fertil Steril. 2020 Feb;113(2):305-322. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.014.
3
Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 15;10(10):CD004507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004507.pub4.
5
IUI: review and systematic assessment of the evidence that supports global recommendations.
Hum Reprod Update. 2018 May 1;24(3):300-319. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx041.
6
Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
Synchronised approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 21;2014(12):CD006942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006942.pub3.
10
Definition and epidemiology of unexplained infertility.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Feb;69(2):109-15. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000043.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验