Neira Sara, Guiu-Souto Jacobo, Pais Paulino, Rodríguez Martínez de Llano Sofía, Fernández Carlos, Pubul Virginia, Ruibal Álvaro, Pombar Miguel, Gago-Arias Araceli, Pardo-Montero Juan
Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Department of Medical Physics, Centro Oncolóxico de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain.
Med Phys. 2021 Sep;48(9):5448-5458. doi: 10.1002/mp.15090. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
To obtain individualized internal doses with a Monte Carlo (MC) method in patients undergoing diagnostic [18F]FCH-PET studies and to compare such doses with the MIRD method calculations.
A patient cohort of 17 males were imaged after intravenous administration of a mean [18F]FCH activity of 244.3 MBq. The resulting PET/CT images were processed in order to generate individualized input source and geometry files for dose computation with the MC tool GATE. The resulting dose estimates were studied and compared to the MIRD method with two different computational phantoms. Mass correction of the S-factors was applied when possible. Potential sources of uncertainty were closely examined: the effect of partial body images, urinary bladder emptying, and biokinetic modeling.
Large differences in doses between our methodology and the MIRD method were found, generally in the range ±25%, and up to ±120% for some cases. The mass scaling showed improvements, especially for non-walled and high-uptake tissues. Simulations of the urinary bladder emptying showed negligible effects on doses to other organs, with the exception of the prostate. Dosimetry based on partial PET/CT images (excluding the legs) resulted in an overestimation of mean doses to bone, skin, and remaining tissues, and minor differences in other organs/tissues. Estimated uncertainties associated with the biokinetics of FCH introduce variations of cumulated activities in the range of ±10% in the high-uptake organs.
The MC methodology allows for a higher degree of dosimetry individualization than the MIRD methodology, which in some cases leads to important differences in dose values. Dosimetry of FCH-PET based on a single partial PET study seems viable due to the particular biokinetics of FCH, even though some correction factors may need to be applied to estimate mean skin/bone doses.
采用蒙特卡罗(MC)方法获取接受诊断性[18F]FCH-PET研究患者的个体化体内剂量,并将此类剂量与MIRD方法计算结果进行比较。
17名男性患者队列在静脉注射平均[18F]FCH活度为244.3 MBq后进行成像。对所得PET/CT图像进行处理,以生成个体化输入源和几何文件,用于使用MC工具GATE进行剂量计算。研究所得剂量估计值,并与使用两种不同计算体模的MIRD方法进行比较。尽可能对S因子进行质量校正。仔细检查了潜在的不确定来源:局部身体图像的影响、膀胱排空和生物动力学建模。
发现我们的方法与MIRD方法之间的剂量存在很大差异,一般在±25%范围内,某些情况下高达±120%。质量缩放显示出改善,特别是对于无壁和高摄取组织。膀胱排空模拟显示,除前列腺外,对其他器官的剂量影响可忽略不计。基于部分PET/CT图像(不包括腿部)的剂量测定导致对骨骼、皮肤和其余组织的平均剂量估计过高,而在其他器官/组织中差异较小。与FCH生物动力学相关的估计不确定性导致高摄取器官中累积活度的变化范围为±10%。
MC方法比MIRD方法允许更高程度的剂量个体化,这在某些情况下会导致剂量值出现重要差异。由于FCH的特殊生物动力学,基于单次部分PET研究的FCH-PET剂量测定似乎可行,尽管可能需要应用一些校正因子来估计平均皮肤/骨骼剂量。