Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Marketing, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Elife. 2021 Jul 15;10:e60874. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60874.
How does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Using a drift diffusion model, we predicted the time course of neural signals associated with AVC and EA. Results suggested that event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with the time course of model-predicted taste-attribute signals, with no modulation by regulation. By contrast, suppression of frontal and occipital alpha power correlated with the time course of EA, tracked tastiness according to its goal relevance, and predicted individual variation in successful down-regulation of tastiness. Additionally, an earlier rise in frontal and occipital theta power represented food tastiness more strongly during regulation and predicted a weaker influence of food tastiness on behaviour. Our findings illuminate how regulation modifies the representation of attributes during the process of EA.
调节焦点如何改变属性值建构(AVC)和证据积累(EA)?我们在参与者自然做出选择或通过关注健康属性或减少对味道属性的关注来调节选择时,记录了食物选择过程中的脑电图。我们使用漂移扩散模型预测了与 AVC 和 EA 相关的神经信号的时间过程。结果表明,事件相关电位(ERPs)与模型预测的味道属性信号的时间过程相关,不受调节的影响。相比之下,额叶和枕叶α功率的抑制与 EA 的时间过程相关,根据其目标相关性追踪美味度,并预测了成功下调美味度的个体差异。此外,额叶和枕叶θ功率的早期上升在调节过程中更强烈地代表了食物的美味度,并预测了食物美味度对行为的影响较弱。我们的发现阐明了调节如何在 EA 过程中改变属性的表示。