IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:1424-1431. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3097301. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
In people with severe neuromotor deficits of trunk and lower extremities, regaining balance in standing is often performed in rehabilitation with manual assistance, rigid body supports or by the use of handrails. To investigate and further expand postural control training in standing, we developed a Robotic Upright Stand Trainer (RobUST). In this study, we used RobUST to deliver trunk perturbations while simultaneously providing postural assistive forces on the pelvis in 10 able-bodied adults. Posture control responses with 'pelvic support' was then compared to 'no support' and 'hand supported' standing, with and without assistance from RobUST. We characterize postural imbalance with kinematic displacements and center of pressure (COP) outcomes, such as amplitude and root mean square of the excursions of COP. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was also applied to investigate muscle control. We additionally investigated ground reaction and handrail forces during standing to analyze how postural strategies and muscle mechanisms with 'pelvic support' via RobUST would differ from standing with 'no support' and with the 'handrail support'. Our results show that during perturbations, pelvic assistive support decreased kinematic and COP excursions compared to standing with no support. The pelvic assistance from RobUST showed similar level of COP changes as the use of handrail support but without reducing muscle activity or ground reaction forces. As expected, the maximum level of postural stability was observed when participants used the handrail and received pelvic assistive forces. In conclusion, RobUST demonstrates potential as a training device since it enhances postural balance without significantly removing muscular control mechanisms that are of interest in re-training postural control strategies in standing.
在严重的躯干和下肢神经运动功能障碍的人群中,为了重新获得站立平衡,通常在康复治疗中通过手动辅助、刚性身体支撑或使用扶手来实现。为了研究和进一步扩展站立姿势控制训练,我们开发了一种机器人直立站立训练器(RobUST)。在这项研究中,我们使用 RobUST 对 10 名健康成年人进行躯干扰动,同时在骨盆上提供姿势辅助力。然后,将带有“骨盆支撑”的姿势控制反应与“无支撑”和“手持支撑”站立进行比较,同时考虑 RobUST 的辅助情况。我们通过运动学位移和压力中心(COP)结果(如 COP 偏移的幅度和均方根)来描述姿势不平衡,表面肌电图(sEMG)也用于研究肌肉控制。我们还研究了站立时的地面反作用力和扶手力,以分析通过 RobUST 进行“骨盆支撑”的姿势策略和肌肉机制与“无支撑”站立以及“扶手支撑”站立有何不同。我们的研究结果表明,在扰动期间,与无支撑站立相比,骨盆辅助支撑降低了运动学和 COP 偏移。与使用扶手支撑相比,RobUST 提供的骨盆辅助支持显示出相似水平的 COP 变化,但不会降低肌肉活动或地面反作用力。正如预期的那样,当参与者使用扶手并接受骨盆辅助力时,观察到最大的姿势稳定性水平。总之,RobUST 作为一种训练设备具有潜力,因为它可以增强姿势平衡,而不会显著去除对重新训练站立姿势控制策略感兴趣的肌肉控制机制。