Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China.
Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China.
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):631-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
To investigate programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression patterns and define the associations among PD-L1, molecular subtypes, pathological features, and survival in a cohort of 833 patients with endometrial cancer, of whom approximately half had high-risk disease.
Using direct sequencing of the polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain as well as immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6) and p53, we stratified endometrial cancers into four molecular subtypes: POLE ultramutated, MMR-deficient, p53-mutant, and non-specific molecular profile (NSMP). PD-L1 was detected via immunohistochemistry and evaluated in tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) individually and using the combined positive score (CPS).
Positive PD-L1 staining in TCs (≥1%), ICs (≥1%), and in combination (CPS ≥1) was detected in 14.0%, 37.3%, and 45.1% of the samples, respectively. PD-L1 positivity in TCs was more frequent in high-grade than in low-grade tumors, while that in ICs was associated with lymphovascular space invasion, non-endometrioid histology, and deep myometrial invasion. PD-L1 expression in both TCs and ICs was more frequent in POLE ultramutated and MMR-deficient subtypes than in p53-mutant and NSMP subtypes. PD-L1 positivity in TCs, but not in ICs or combined (CPS), was associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.
The distribution and prognostic significance of PD-L1 in TCs versus ICs differ in patients with endometrial cancer, indicating that the separate assessment of PD-L1 in these cells (rather than determining the CPS) may be more relevant to selecting patients eligible for endometrial cancer immunotherapy.
在 833 例子宫内膜癌患者队列中,研究程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)的表达模式,并确定 PD-L1 与分子亚型、病理特征和生存之间的关系,其中约一半患者患有高危疾病。
使用聚合酶 epsilon(POLE)外切酶结构域的直接测序以及错配修复(MMR)蛋白(MLH1、PMS2、MSH2 和 MSH6)和 p53 的免疫组织化学,我们将子宫内膜癌分为四个分子亚型:POLE 超突变型、MMR 缺陷型、p53 突变型和非特异性分子谱(NSMP)。通过免疫组织化学检测 PD-L1,并分别在肿瘤细胞(TCs)和免疫细胞(ICs)中以及使用联合阳性评分(CPS)进行评估。
在 TC(≥1%)、IC(≥1%)和联合(CPS≥1)中检测到阳性 PD-L1 染色的比例分别为 14.0%、37.3%和 45.1%。TC 中的 PD-L1 阳性率在高级别肿瘤中比在低级别肿瘤中更为常见,而 IC 中的 PD-L1 阳性率与淋巴血管空间侵犯、非子宫内膜样组织学和深层肌层浸润有关。PD-L1 在 TCs 和 ICs 中的表达在 POLE 超突变型和 MMR 缺陷型亚型中比在 p53 突变型和 NSMP 亚型中更为常见。TC 中的 PD-L1 阳性率与高危子宫内膜癌患者的预后良好相关,但 IC 中的 PD-L1 阳性率或 CPS 与预后无关。
PD-L1 在 TC 与 IC 中的分布和预后意义在子宫内膜癌患者中不同,表明单独评估这些细胞中的 PD-L1(而不是确定 CPS)可能与选择有资格接受子宫内膜癌免疫治疗的患者更相关。