Global Medical Affairs, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Oct;37(10):1705-1717. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1955667. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
We have conducted a narrative review based on a structured search strategy, focusing on the effects of metformin on the progression of non-diabetic hyperglycemia to clinical type 2 diabetes mellitus. The principal trials that demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of diabetes in at-risk populations randomized to metformin (mostly with impaired glucose tolerance [IGT]) were published mainly from 1999 to 2012. Metformin reduced the 3-year risk of diabetes by -31% in the randomized phase of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), -58% for intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI). Metformin was most effective in younger, heavier subjects. Diminishing but still significant reductions in diabetes risk for subjects originally randomized to these groups were present in the trial's epidemiological follow-up, the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS) at 10 years (-18 and -34%, respectively), 15 years (-18 and -27%), and 22 years (-18 and -25%). Long-term weight loss was also seen in both groups, with better maintenance under metformin. Subgroup analyses from the DPP/DPPOS have shed important light on the actions of metformin, including a greater effect in women with prior gestational diabetes, and a reduction in coronary artery calcium in men that might suggest a cardioprotective effect. Improvements in long-term clinical outcomes with metformin in people with non-diabetic hyperglycemia ("prediabetes") have yet to be demonstrated, but cardiovascular and microvascular benefits were seen for those in the DPPOS who did not did develop diabetes. Multiple health economic analyses suggest that either metformin or ILI is cost-effective in a community setting. Long-term diabetes prevention with metformin is feasible and is supported in influential guidelines for selected groups of subjects. Future research will demonstrate whether intervention with metformin in people with non-diabetic hyperglycemia will improve long-term clinical outcomes.
我们进行了一项叙述性综述,基于结构化的搜索策略,重点关注二甲双胍对非糖尿病性高血糖向临床 2 型糖尿病进展的影响。主要的试验表明,在风险人群中随机分配二甲双胍(主要是糖耐量受损 [IGT])可显著降低糖尿病的发病率,这些试验主要发表于 1999 年至 2012 年。在糖尿病预防计划(DPP)的随机阶段,二甲双胍使糖尿病的 3 年发病风险降低了-31%,强化生活方式干预(ILI)降低了-58%。二甲双胍在更年轻、更重的患者中效果最明显。在最初随机分配到这些组的患者的试验流行病学随访中,DPP 结局研究(DPPOS)中仍存在糖尿病风险降低的趋势,但仍有显著意义,分别为 10 年时-18%和-34%,15 年时-18%和-27%,22 年时-18%和-25%。这两个组的患者体重也都出现了长期下降,而在二甲双胍组中体重下降维持得更好。来自 DPP/DPPOS 的亚组分析揭示了二甲双胍的重要作用,包括对既往妊娠糖尿病女性的效果更大,以及男性冠状动脉钙减少,这可能提示其具有心脏保护作用。在非糖尿病性高血糖(“前期糖尿病”)患者中,二甲双胍在改善长期临床结局方面的效果尚未得到证实,但在 DPPOS 中未发展为糖尿病的患者中观察到了心血管和微血管获益。多项健康经济学分析表明,在社区环境中,二甲双胍或 ILI 具有成本效益。在有选择的患者群体中,长期使用二甲双胍预防糖尿病是可行的,并得到了有影响力的指南的支持。未来的研究将证明,在非糖尿病性高血糖患者中使用二甲双胍是否会改善长期临床结局。