Suppr超能文献

瑞德西韦与标准治疗方案治疗重症2019冠状病毒病感染的疗效比较:28天死亡率分析

Remdesivir Versus Standard-of-Care for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Analysis of 28-Day Mortality.

作者信息

Olender Susan A, Walunas Theresa L, Martinez Esteban, Perez Katherine K, Castagna Antonella, Wang Su, Kurbegov Dax, Goyal Parag, Ripamonti Diego, Balani Bindu, De Rosa Francesco G, De Wit Stéphane, Kim Shin-Woo, Diaz George, Bruno Raffaele, Mullane Kathleen M, Lye David Chien, Gottlieb Robert L, Haubrich Richard H, Chokkalingam Anand P, Wu George, Diaz-Cuervo Helena, Brainard Diana M, Lee I-Heng, Hu Hao, Lin Lanjia, Osinusi Anu O, Bernardino Jose I, Boffito Marta

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Illinois, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 May 26;8(7):ofab278. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab278. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remdesivir is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been shown to shorten time to recovery and improve clinical outcomes in randomized trials.

METHODS

This was the final day 28 comparative analysis of data from a phase 3, randomized, open-label study comparing 2 remdesivir regimens (5 vs 10 days, combined for this analysis [remdesivir cohort]) and a real-world retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (nonremdesivir cohort). Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score matching (up to 1:10 ratio) was used to ensure comparable populations. We assessed day 14 clinical recovery (determined using a 7-point ordinal scale) and day 28 all-cause mortality (coprimary endpoints).

RESULTS

A total of 368 (remdesivir) and 1399 (nonremdesivir) patients were included in the matched analysis. The day 14 clinical recovery rate was significantly higher among the remdesivir versus the nonremdesivir cohort (65.2% vs 57.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.90; = 0.002). The day 28 mortality rate was significantly lower in the remdesivir cohort versus the nonremdesivir cohort (12.0% vs 16.2%; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-.95;  = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Remdesivir was associated with significantly higher rates of day 14 clinical recovery, and lower day 28 mortality, compared with standard-of-care treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These data, taken together, support the use of remdesivir to improve clinical recovery and decrease mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

摘要

背景

瑞德西韦已获美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者,并且在随机试验中已显示可缩短康复时间并改善临床结局。

方法

这是一项对3期随机开放标签研究数据的第28天最终比较分析,该研究比较了两种瑞德西韦治疗方案(5天与10天,本分析中将二者合并[瑞德西韦队列]),以及一项对接受标准治疗的患者进行的真实世界回顾性纵向队列研究(非瑞德西韦队列)。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,确诊感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2),在室内空气中氧饱和度≤94%或需要补充氧气,伴有肺部浸润。采用倾向评分匹配(最高1:10比例)以确保人群具有可比性。我们评估了第14天的临床康复情况(使用7分序数量表确定)和第28天的全因死亡率(共同主要终点)。

结果

匹配分析共纳入368例(瑞德西韦组)和1399例(非瑞德西韦组)患者。瑞德西韦队列第14天的临床康复率显著高于非瑞德西韦队列(65.2%对57.1%;优势比[OR]为1.49;95%置信区间[CI]为1.16 - 1.90;P = 0.002)。瑞德西韦队列第28天的死亡率显著低于非瑞德西韦队列(12.0%对16.2%;OR为0.67;95%CI为0.47 - 0.95;P = 0.03)。

结论

与COVID-19住院患者的标准治疗相比,瑞德西韦与第14天更高的临床康复率以及第28天更低的死亡率相关。综合这些数据,支持使用瑞德西韦来改善临床康复并降低SARS-CoV-2感染导致的死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b9/8287533/f9964205dc68/ofab278_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验