Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合经导管栓塞/化疗栓塞治疗门静脉高压合并动门脉分流的肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt combined with transcatheter embolization/chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal hypertension and arterioportal shunt.

作者信息

Lu Hai-Lin, Xuan Fei-Fei, Luo Yao-Chang, Qin Xiao

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.

Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Nov;46(11):5417-5427. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03214-5. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with transarterial embolization/transarterial chemoembolization (TAE/TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal hypertension and arterioportal shunt (APS).

METHODS

Consecutive hospitalized patients having HCC accompanied by portal hypertension and APS were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 103 patients were enrolled. Of them, 26 patients were in Group A and 77 patients were in Group B according to the treatment protocol (Group A: TIPS plus TAE/TACE; Group B: TAE/TACE alone). The clinical outcomes and survival rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean survival time in Group A and Group B were 14 mo and 9.9 mo, respectively, with statistical difference (p = 0.043). The immediate APS improvement rate was 95.2% in Group A and 91.9% in Group B, respectively, with no signficant difference (p = 1.000). However, the first follow-up consultation revealed that APS improvement rate in Group A was more obvious (66.7% vs 27.4%, p = 0.001). Objective response rate of HCC tended to be greater in Group A compared with Group B (65.4% vs 38.7%, p = 0.019). Liver function parameters significantly increased in Group A than those in Group B. After TIPS placement, the mean portal pressure gradient decreased from 32.61 ± 8.87 mmHg to 15.61 ± 8.15 mmHg, with significant difference (p = 0.000). The rate of absorption of ascites and control of variceal bleeding were statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.045 and 0.039, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our research suggests that TIPS combined with TAE/TACE seems to be safe and efficacious in patients with HCC accompanied by portal hypertension and APS, albeit may be accompanied by liver function damage.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)联合经动脉栓塞术/经动脉化疗栓塞术(TAE/TACE)治疗伴有门静脉高压和动门脉分流(APS)的肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。

方法

对连续住院的伴有门静脉高压和APS的HCC患者进行回顾性分析。共纳入103例患者。根据治疗方案,其中26例患者为A组,77例患者为B组(A组:TIPS联合TAE/TACE;B组:单纯TAE/TACE)。比较两组的临床结局和生存率。

结果

A组和B组的平均生存时间分别为14个月和9.9个月,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.043)。A组和B组的即时APS改善率分别为95.2%和91.9%,差异无统计学意义(p = 1.000)。然而,首次随访显示A组的APS改善率更明显(66.7%对27.4%,p = 0.001)。A组HCC的客观缓解率倾向于高于B组(65.4%对38.7%,p = 0.019)。A组肝功能参数显著高于B组。TIPS置入后,平均门静脉压力梯度从32.61±8.87 mmHg降至15.61±8.15 mmHg,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.000)。两组腹水吸收率和静脉曲张出血控制率差异有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.045和0.039)。

结论

我们的研究表明,TIPS联合TAE/TACE治疗伴有门静脉高压和APS的HCC患者似乎是安全有效的,尽管可能伴有肝功能损害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验