Medical Laboratory Department, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Medical Laboratory Department, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu, China.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jan;30(1):413-421. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06442-z. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
Few mortality-scoring models are available for solid tumor patients who are predisposed to develop Escherichia coli-caused bloodstream infection (ECBSI). We aimed to develop a mortality-scoring model by using information from blood culture time to positivity (TTP) and other clinical variables.
A cohort of solid tumor patients who were admitted to hospital with ECBSI and received empirical antimicrobial therapy was enrolled. Survivors and non-survivors were compared to identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were adopted to identify the mortality-associated predictors. Risk scores were assigned by weighting the regression coefficients with corresponding natural logarithm of the odds ratio for each predictor.
Solid tumor patients with ECBSI were distributed in the development and validation groups, respectively. Six mortality-associated predictors were identified and included in the scoring model: acute respiratory distress (ARDS), TTP ≤ 8 h, inappropriate antibiotic therapy, blood transfusion, fever ≥ 39 °C, and metastasis. Prognostic scores were categorized into three groups that predicted mortality: low risk (< 10% mortality, 0-1 points), medium risk (10-20% mortality, 2 points), and high risk (> 20% mortality, ≥ 3 points). The TTP-incorporated scoring model showed excellent discrimination and calibration for both groups, with AUC being 0.833 vs 0.844, respectively, and no significant difference in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (6.709, P = 0.48) and the chi-square test (6.993, P = 0.46). Youden index showed the best cutoff value of ≥ 3 with 76.11% sensitivity and 79.29% specificity. TTP-incorporated scoring model had higher AUC than no TTP-incorporated model (0.837 vs 0.817, P < 0.01).
Our TTP-incorporated scoring model was associated with improving capability in predicting ECBSI-related mortality. It can be a practical tool for clinicians to identify and manage bacteremic solid tumor patients with high risk of mortality.
目前用于预测易发生大肠埃希菌血流感染(ECBSI)的实体瘤患者死亡率的评分模型较少。我们旨在通过使用血培养阳性时间(TTP)和其他临床变量信息来开发一种死亡率评分模型。
本队列纳入了因 ECBSI 住院并接受经验性抗菌治疗的实体瘤患者。比较幸存者和非幸存者,以确定院内死亡率的危险因素。采用单变量和多变量回归分析确定与死亡率相关的预测因素。通过对每个预测因素的回归系数进行加权,以相应的优势比的自然对数来分配风险评分。
ECBSI 合并实体瘤患者分别分布在开发组和验证组中。确定了 6 个与死亡率相关的预测因素,并将其纳入评分模型:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)、TTP≤8 小时、不适当的抗生素治疗、输血、发热≥39°C 和转移。预后评分分为三组,预测死亡率:低危(<10%死亡率,0-1 分)、中危(10-20%死亡率,2 分)和高危(>20%死亡率,≥3 分)。TTP 纳入的评分模型在两组中均具有良好的区分度和校准度,AUC 分别为 0.833 和 0.844,Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验(6.709,P=0.48)和卡方检验(6.993,P=0.46)无显著差异。Youden 指数显示最佳截断值为≥3,敏感性为 76.11%,特异性为 79.29%。TTP 纳入的评分模型 AUC 高于无 TTP 纳入的模型(0.837 比 0.817,P<0.01)。
我们的 TTP 纳入评分模型与提高预测 ECBSI 相关死亡率的能力相关。它可以是临床医生识别和管理死亡率高的血流感染实体瘤患者的实用工具。